 | | Thoughts on breaking out a pneumatics subgroup —David C. Pyatt
|
| | | Hello fellow LEGO Engineers... What does everyone think about breaking off a pneumatics subgroup (Todd permitting, of course)? It seems quite a few of us are toying around with pneumatics now and it would make finding previous posts alot easier to (...) (25 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Thoughts on breaking out a pneumatics subgroup —Soh Chio Siong
|
| | | | | (...) Hey, I was thinking the same. But I would be much biased ... -- C S Soh (URL) where air is power (25 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Thoughts on breaking out a pneumatics subgroup —David C. Pyatt
|
| | | | | | (...) At least we would have 1 good link :O) Dave (25 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Thoughts on breaking out a pneumatics subgroup —Denis Cousineau
|
| | | | | I 100% agree with this suggestion. Denis. (...) (25 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Thoughts on breaking out a pneumatics subgroup —David C. Pyatt
|
| | | | I seem to have caused some panic amongst a few people who have contacted me directly... What I am proposing is a new LUGNET Robotics.Pneumatics group in addition not replacement to any and all already existing newsgroups containing LEGO pneumatics (...) (25 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Thoughts on breaking out a pneumatics subgroup —Adam Ogle
|
| | | | I definitely agree. I love my pneumatics and would like it. Lugnet.pneu :) -- Legoer, Adam Ogle David C. Pyatt <dcpyatt@netzero.net> wrote in message news:FpMFnD.10D@lugnet.com... (...) me (...) in (...) containing (...) this as (...) these (...) (...) (25 years ago, 9-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Thoughts on breaking out a pneumatics subgroup —Soh Chio Siong
|
| | | | (...) Me, too. I would also prefer it to be "lugnet.pneumatics" rather than a robotics sub-group. -- C S Soh (URL) where air is power (25 years ago, 9-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Thoughts on breaking out a pneumatics subgroup —Mario Ferrari
|
| | | | (...) robotics (...) Or lugnet.technic.pneumatics. After all pneumatics belongs to the Technic theme. Anyway, one way or the other, I like the idea of a specific subgroup. Mario Web page: (URL) member page: (URL) member of ItLUG: (URL) (25 years ago, 9-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Thoughts on breaking out a pneumatics subgroup —Peter Vogel
|
| | | | (...) Just to express the contrarian view: I think it is a bad idea. Too often I see subgroups created that languish due to a lack of volume. There's a certain "critical mass" needed to keep a group going, if one goes a week without postings, there (...) (25 years ago, 9-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Thoughts on breaking out a pneumatics subgroup —Brian Alano
|
| | | | | I agree with Peter: (...) -- ___...___ You hear, O LORD, the desire of the afflicted; you encourage them, and you listen to their cry --Psalms 10:17 (25 years ago, 9-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Thoughts on breaking out a pneumatics subgroup —Arjen Gerstel
|
| | | | | I agree with you, Peter. Usually there are somewhere between 10 and 30 postings to this group per day. It shouldn't be too difficult to find the pneumatics postings among them. The daily number of postings as it is now is enough to keep a healthy (...) (25 years ago, 9-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Thoughts on breaking out a pneumatics subgroup —Rita Bisschop
|
| | | | | (...) I also agree with you, Peter. I'm subscribing to lugnet.robotics via the crynwr mailing list and I enjoy the trawking through all the posts. I think, if there were only few (or even no!) posts a day, this pleasure would leave... Simon (25 years ago, 9-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Thoughts on breaking out a pneumatics subgroup —David C. Pyatt
|
| | | | May I plead my ignorance to newsreader feeds? Reading directly from LUGNET when you select Technics you get all of the groups beneath it unless you pick a specific subgroup to further qualify your filter, so you get: Arctic Action Expert Builder (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Thoughts on breaking out a pneumatics subgroup —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Actually, lugnet.technic doesn't have any subgroup newsgroups, even though (URL) has subcategories on the website. The categories listed above are for future DB expansion and other things, but won't likely be separate newsgroups for a very (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Thoughts on breaking out a pneumatics subgroup —David C. Pyatt
|
| | | | | I grasped the cross-link concept... so are you saying that "if" there were true subgroups that they would not post to the newsfeeds? I'm still a little confused... Looking at the posts just now I see that there are no subgroups currently... I (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Robotics Conference Session?????? —Barbara Nostrand
|
| | | | Hi. My hard disk drive died this morning taking with it the announcement posted to this list about the robotics in education session at a forthcoming IEEE conference. Does anyone at all still have that announcement. I talked to the organizers and (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | RE: Robotics Conference Session?????? —Carl Schaefer
|
| | | | Barbara, In reference to your question about the call for papers, please find attached below the original announcement. I, too, hope to get a paper in the session as my class of freshman engineers are designing and building an Urban Search and (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
