Subject:
|
Re: Thoughts on breaking out a pneumatics subgroup
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 9 Feb 2000 08:10:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1000 times
|
| |
|
|
C S Soh <cssoh@singnet.com.sg> wrote:
> Adam Ogle wrote:
>
> > I definitely agree. I love my pneumatics and would like it.
> >
> > Lugnet.pneu :)
>
> Me, too. I would also prefer it to be "lugnet.pneumatics" rather than a • robotics
> sub-group.
Or lugnet.technic.pneumatics. After all pneumatics belongs to the Technic
theme.
Anyway, one way or the other, I like the idea of a specific subgroup.
Mario
Web page: http://www.geocities.com/~marioferrari
LUGNET member page: http://www.lugnet.com/people/members/?m=22
Proud member of ItLUG: http://www.itlug.org
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Thoughts on breaking out a pneumatics subgroup
|
| (...) Just to express the contrarian view: I think it is a bad idea. Too often I see subgroups created that languish due to a lack of volume. There's a certain "critical mass" needed to keep a group going, if one goes a week without postings, there (...) (25 years ago, 9-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
