Subject:
|
Re: Thoughts on breaking out a pneumatics subgroup
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 9 Feb 2000 22:12:04 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Rita Bisschop <odb001981@online{ihatespam}.be>
|
Viewed:
|
1240 times
|
| |
|
|
> Pneumatics is one way of achieving "action" in a Technic model (robotic
> or otherwise) and as such belongs as a part of the general Technic
> discussions,
> not subdivided away into oblivion (IMHO of course).
I also agree with you, Peter. I'm subscribing to lugnet.robotics via the
crynwr mailing list and I enjoy the trawking through all the posts. I
think, if there were only few (or even no!) posts a day, this pleasure would
leave...
Simon
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Thoughts on breaking out a pneumatics subgroup
|
| (...) Just to express the contrarian view: I think it is a bad idea. Too often I see subgroups created that languish due to a lack of volume. There's a certain "critical mass" needed to keep a group going, if one goes a week without postings, there (...) (25 years ago, 9-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
