 | | Re: Mindstorms NXT programming languages
|
|
(...) Well, let me make my position clear. I want more memory too, and I understand Danny and Steve B. want for more memory too. But you can't get somethin for nuttin'. My initial reaction was "64K !?!? You mean M right? DRAM is cheap!". But LEGO (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Mindstorms NXT programming languages
|
|
(...) EXACTLY. And my three-month-old cell phone has 4M of memory (which is needs because it has a camera in it), but my not-born-yet NXT will have 256k+64k. Over eight years, most devices have increased in memory capacity by a factor of maybe 100 (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Mindstorms NXT programming languages
|
|
(...) Kevin, While I agree with your points regarding cost/features; and I can understand the view of the "need more memory" crowd. I think what needs to be expressed more "eloquently" is the fact that while starting from the ground up, Lego seemed (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Mindstorms NXT programming languages
|
|
(...) Sorry Steve, But, are you saying because ~YOU~ or your group can not imagine it, then is should not or cannot be done? Chris (20 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Mindstorms NXT programming languages
|
|
(...) Hi Dan, Your desire to have cutting edge robotics computing technology at your fingertips is compelling and *very* understandable. The robotics challenges you want to overcome sound very interesting. Where you and I differ is expecting to be (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Mindstorms NXT programming languages
|
|
(...) You are right when you say the link is Bluetooth. With the RCX the link was IR signals. As long as there is some communication protocol (the more standard, the better) extremely complex logic can get into a robot's behavior. With the RCX I was (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Mindstorms NXT programming languages
|
|
good analysis. Also keep in mind that Lego sells primarily through retail resellers, so their take is considerably less than the SRP. (Even the Lego stores have huge overhead, being in expensive malls). To sell a product like this at < $250 and make (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Mindstorms NXT programming languages
|
|
What would I like to implement that won't fit in 256K... check out this list of modules from Pyro: # PyroModuleDirectControl # PyroModuleSequencingControl # PyroModuleBehaviorBasedControl # PyroModuleReinforcementLearning # PyroModuleNeuralNetworks (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Mindstorms NXT programming languages
|
|
(...) (speaking out from the peanut gallery) I had a big message going about this, but ROSCO has save me the time to type it. Ditto on all the above. LEGO had a price point they wouldn't budge from. According to the Wired article, more than one of (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Mindstorms NXT programming languages
|
|
(...) Now this is funny. Are you suggesting (A) JB doesn't know much about hardware or (B) JB doesn't know about LEGO's development process? If you select (A) or (B), you should rethink your answer. On Fri, January 13, 2006 1:23 pm, steve wrote: (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|