 | | Made me cry!
|
|
Has anyone seen/read the Ultimate Builders Set The Untold Story at Lego.com (URL) Look at all those parts..... this is the phrase that I got upset about ".....When their work place becomes too messy Anthony and Mads do not start to sort the (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Product Review: Linksys WVC11B and VEO Observer
|
|
(...) One thing I think is worth pointing out is that at least the VEO Observer uses some proprietary activeX applet and is only compatible with IE 5.0+, so no support for other browsers (or Linux). Anything except windows is explicitly *not* (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX 1.0 without external power jack?
|
|
(...) Apart from supply jack in 1.0 and 2.0 marking on 2.0, there are some PCB differences, see board scans here: (URL) 2.0 brick uses a 76kHz IR receiver chip to get better compatibility with Spybots/Manas but much lower sensitivity between RCX to (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX 1.0 without external power jack?
|
|
(...) The Lego outlet at Dawsonville might have some 9709's available--yep, the one's with the jack. I think they are currently 59.95 or 69.95. If anybody wants some and is going to Brickfest PDX, you can do a phone order for the RCX (so you can buy (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Behavior of the Roomba
|
|
Thinking about the one major robotic invention that's creeping into homes these days, it doesn't seem too complex an algorithm. The behavior seems to be as follows: 1) It starts out in an outward spiral motion 2) When it encounters a wall / stairs (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX 1.0 without external power jack?
|
|
(...) Ooops my bad... Yes they are marked 2.0. Has anyone checked whether they are any different to the 1.0 from the 1.5 set? ROSCO (22 years ago, 20-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX 1.0 without external power jack?
|
|
I have 2 RCXs that came with the RIS 2.0 that are labeled RCX 2.0. my $0.02 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ross Crawford" <rosscraw@bigpond.net.au> To: <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 12:14 AM Subject: Re: RCX 1.0 (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX 1.0 without external power jack?
|
|
I bought the brick by itself and I can see how the seller mis-listed it. Live and learn. I got it at a good price so I'll keep it. I still want one with an external jack. Oh well, just have to buy another. :0) Thanks for the info. Mike (22 years ago, 20-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX 1.0 without external power jack?
|
|
(...) Unfortunately Mike, it's rather confusing - although the *sets* are numbered 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0, the RCXs are all marked 1.0. Only the one that came in the 1.0 set (9719) has a power jack, although you can also still get them from Lego (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: RCX 1.0 without external power jack?
|
|
That is a 1.5... same numbers... no power jack. Liz B (...) Behalf (...) jack. (...) all (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RCX 1.0 without external power jack?
|
|
I bought a RCX 1.0 used on Bricklink to get an RCX with an external jack. The one that arrived is marked 1.0 but has no external jack. I thought all 1.0 units had the jack. Anyone else run in to this? Mike (22 years ago, 20-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: I was thinking about bipedal walkers this morning and....
|
|
(...) It doesn't work (yet), but it's very close... (URL) K (22 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: I was thinking about bipedal walkers this morning and....
|
|
I did, did no one read it? (...) (22 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: I was thinking about bipedal walkers this morning and....
|
|
Tinkertoys is close. This site also has the plans: (URL) -----Original Message----- (...) (22 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: I was thinking about bipedal walkers this morning and....
|
|
(...) I have almost nothing to contribute to discussions re: robotics, but I spotted this marginally relevant story on cnn.com: (URL) of course. Dave! (22 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: I was thinking about bipedal walkers this morning and....
|
|
Lots of responses to my post, so I'm following up my own post to address all of them. A lot of people are pointing out that this has been done before in the field of robotics, but what I was actually asking about is if it's been done before in (...) (22 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: I was thinking about bipedal walkers this morning and....
|
|
I think you need to get some shifting of weight over the hips involved so that you don't fall to the side. it's complex. do a google search - i'll bet there is lots of online material available.... good luck (...) (22 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: I was thinking about bipedal walkers this morning and....
|
|
(...) Parallax markets the Toddler, which is a walking Robot that shifts its center of gravity to walk. It turns by sliding its feet in opposite directions. It has 34 possible movements. (22 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: I was thinking about bipedal walkers this morning and....
|
|
Now, think about what physically goes into making yourself walk. How much energy and control is involved? Try walking on a flat, level surface (or better, one at a slight decline, like a very long handicap ramp). Walk with your natural gait, at the (...) (22 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: I was thinking about bipedal walkers this morning and....
|
|
(...) More info here (URL) (22 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
