Subject:
|
Re: RCX 1.0 without external power jack?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sat, 20 Dec 2003 09:25:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1065 times
|
| |
|
|
> Ooops my bad... Yes they are marked 2.0. Has anyone checked whether they are any
> different to the 1.0 from the 1.5 set?
>
> ROSCO
Apart from supply jack in 1.0 and 2.0 marking on 2.0, there are some PCB
differences, see board scans here:
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=38746
And 2.0 brick uses a 76kHz IR receiver chip to get better compatibility with
Spybots/Manas but much lower sensitivity between RCX to RCX (or RCX remote to
RCX) communication. See this thread: http://news.lugnet.com/robotics/rcx/?n=2003
Philo
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: RCX 1.0 without external power jack?
|
| (...) It looks like there isn't as much output drive protection on the RCX2.0 PCBs, unless the MLX10402CB parts have more internal protection than the ELEX 10402As. Does anyone know of any information available about this? I will say now that I (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
10 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
