Subject:
|
Re: RCX 1.0 without external power jack?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sat, 20 Dec 2003 10:37:11 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Paul Britton <paul.britton@ntlworld.^StopSpam^com>
|
Viewed:
|
904 times
|
| |
|
|
Philippe Hurbain wrote:
>
> Apart from supply jack in 1.0 and 2.0 marking on 2.0, there are some
> PCB differences, see board scans here:
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=38746
>
> And 2.0 brick uses a 76kHz IR receiver chip to get better
> compatibility with Spybots/Manas but much lower sensitivity between
> RCX to RCX (or RCX remote to RCX) communication. See this thread:
> http://news.lugnet.com/robotics/rcx/?n=2003
It looks like there isn't as much output drive protection on the RCX2.0
PCBs, unless the MLX10402CB parts have more internal protection than the
ELEX 10402As.
Does anyone know of any information available about this? I will say now
that I haven't tried looking myself yet, just thought I'd ask first!
PaulB
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: RCX 1.0 without external power jack?
|
| (...) Apart from supply jack in 1.0 and 2.0 marking on 2.0, there are some PCB differences, see board scans here: (URL) 2.0 brick uses a 76kHz IR receiver chip to get better compatibility with Spybots/Manas but much lower sensitivity between RCX to (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
