 | | Re: Another update for WIRRL
|
|
(...) I guess that's because of regulatory issues. Getting anything with radio transmission approved for all countries Lego wants to sell in can prove a daunting task... And IR can prove very effective: did you try Spybotics remote control? it (...) (23 years ago, 23-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Another update for WIRRL
|
|
"Gareth Bestor" <bestorga@us.ibm.com> wrote in message news:H4E4uq.JvL@lugnet.com... (...) in (...) eyeing (...) receiver (...) reveiver (...) I've also followed this intresting thread. And now I'm wondering why Lego have used the infrared (...) (23 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Another update for WIRRL
|
|
I should have removed the word "messenger". After all, doing something by "proxy" would imply a messenger-type role. What I meant was, for DeviceA to send a message to DeviceB, they would have to use some sort of proxy or router between them (the (...) (23 years ago, 23-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Mindstorm Telerobot
|
|
(...) (URL) (23 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Cracking open the RCX
|
|
(URL) B" <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> wrote in message news:E1846MB-0007HP-...url.com... (...) (23 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Mindstorm Telerobot
|
|
Hey Guys, Has Anyone of ull hooked up the Lego To the Internet basically a Telerobot, if so do sent me details and also the web link. Thanks Shibu (23 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: What version for my rcx 1.5?
|
|
(...) The brick version doesn't really mean a lot (other than that version 1.0 bricks had the external power jack). If you download the firmware from the 2.0 SDK then your 1.5 brick is an RCX 2.0 and it will work perfectly well with NQC, BricxCC (...) (23 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Another update for WIRRL
|
|
What's a "proxy messenger"? Couldn't the reflection problem be solved by placing a barrier in between the emitter and receiver? Timothy (...) (23 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Cracking open the RCX
|
|
I had a link to the schematics and working on an RCX, I thought, but I can't find it. We have an RCX that's "A" motor port is malfunctioning. If it's a loose connection, we'd like to re-solder it. Anybody have a link to nice, clear pictures of what (...) (23 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Another update for WIRRL
|
|
Just in case people are a bit confused by the schematic, the circuit would be needed for each device that will participate in an RF bridge. I abandoned the idea of using two different frequencies because: 1) As soon as you attempt communication (...) (23 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | What version for my rcx 1.5?
|
|
Hello, I am starting to look at my mindstorm again. It is version 1.5 and I have prev. used NQC and RcxCC. What should I use now? How about the new sdk 2.0? Can I use that one? Can I use the new versions of NQC and RcxCC? Hope someone can bring me (...) (23 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Update for DJGPP version
|
|
I have placed instructions for building the cross compiler for DJGPP on our website, (URL) They are (as of this posting) incomplete. Biunutils can be configured and built but gcc currently has a proplem in the build stage. It looks like a c++ error (...) (23 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: serial tower
|
|
I have an extra serial, do you want to trade? Timothy (...) (23 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Another update for WIRRL
|
|
I'm watching your postings with some interest as I'm also very interested in implementing are wireless RF<->IR interface for the RCX, and have been eyeing the Linx transmitter/receivers too. One question - could some of the transmit/receive (...) (23 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Another update for WIRRL
|
|
Instead of worrying about the half duplex communication, wouldn't it just be easier to have tranceiver at two different frequencies? If I am missing something, go ahead and say so. I know very, very little about electronics. Timothy (...) (23 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Another update for WIRRL
|
|
I just noticed at least one glaring error with the new schematic... Say, for argument, an RCX sends "1001", which, in IR, would be "0110". The IR detector of WIRRL would do nothing for the first bit ("0"), but the next bit ("1") should be sent over (...) (23 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | differences between the legOS versions
|
|
Hi all, Can anyone tell me, where i can get informations about the differnces of the serveral legOS versions. I use currently legOS 0.2.3 Christian (23 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Thinner Diff (was: something i said?)
|
|
you could make that one stud thinner by placing it within a framework. now i have something else to work on... i did recently make on from a 24t gear but it rotates around one of the four holes off axis and is really only good for use in a sensor (...) (23 years ago, 20-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: something i said?
|
|
Finally i can give credit where credit is due. I remember seeing the pics but checking my directory i didn't find a the original names so i couldn't remember who you were. anyways, proper credit will be given in the next day. regards, m. "Rick S" (...) (23 years ago, 20-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Another update for WIRRL
|
|
To those interested, I've made a new schematic (WIRRL Rev. 2a) using a better TX/RX pair (Linx LC Series) and I think I've found a possible better solution for handling flow of data. This new diagram eliminates three transistors and replaces the (...) (23 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
