Subject:
|
Re: Another update for WIRRL
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:08:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
956 times
|
| |
|
|
I'm watching your postings with some interest as I'm also very interested in
implementing are wireless RF<->IR interface for the RCX, and have been eyeing
the Linx transmitter/receivers too. One question - could some of the
transmit/receive switching be simplified by having the transmitter and receiver
operate at different RF frequencies? In other words, have the RF-to-IR reveiver
and IR-to-RF transmitter be entirely separate circuits?
You might also be interested in
http://www.connectionlab.com/elmo/
which has a RF transceiver, albeit for the Handyboard with a direct TTL
interface (hence no IR conversion)
- Gareth
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Another update for WIRRL
|
| "Gareth Bestor" <bestorga@us.ibm.com> wrote in message news:H4E4uq.JvL@lugnet.com... (...) in (...) eyeing (...) receiver (...) reveiver (...) I've also followed this intresting thread. And now I'm wondering why Lego have used the infrared (...) (22 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | RE: Another update for WIRRL
|
| I just noticed at least one glaring error with the new schematic... Say, for argument, an RCX sends "1001", which, in IR, would be "0110". The IR detector of WIRRL would do nothing for the first bit ("0"), but the next bit ("1") should be sent over (...) (22 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
