 | | Re: Rover Programming
|
|
(...) Try this (leJos): import josx.platform.rcx.*; import josx.util.*; import josx.robotics.Navigator; public class Test { public static void main (String[] arg) throws Exception { int size = 100; Navigator nav = new RotationNavigator( ( float)8.5, (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Rover Programming
|
|
(...) While we're talking about programming rovers, could someone give me an example of a 'spiral drive around behavior' in either RCX Code (v1.5) or Gordon's Brick Programmer? Or how about code with two rotation sensors attached to the (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Dead reckoning (was Re: Rover Programming)
|
|
(...) A systematic search pattern is one solution. Not being too anal about it is another - random walking the domain will eventually explore the whole of it, although increasingly inefficiently as time goes on. (...) It's killing me. My first (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: pbForth vs RCX 1.0
|
|
"Mario Beaulieu" <mariobeaulieu@videotron.ca> writes... (...) Yes. I run pbForth on RCX 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0. No differences. (...) No, to my knowledge. In pbForth the IR port is entirely devoted to communication between the brick and the terminal. (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Light Sensor Problem
|
|
Hello, I have been trying out the demo programs in legOS. all demos worked fine except linetrack.c. When I download linetrack.lx in the RCX (RCX2.0) and put it on the test pad that comes with mind storm the bot goes srtaight. It does not recognize (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Rover Programming
|
|
(...) So how do you remember what you've already explored? I think you *need* three states if you want your robot to curiously explore it's environment without continually re-exploring areas that it's already visited but which proved to be empty. If (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Rover Programming
|
|
(...) It's the opposite of impoling. ---...--- Steve Baker ---...--- Mail : <sjbaker1@airmail.net> WorkMail: <sjbaker@link.com> URLs : (8 URLs) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Navigation using landmarks (Was: Re: lasers and RCX)
|
|
(...) So with the speed of sound being something like 300 meters/second, sounds spaced 100mSec apart would travel about 30 meters before the next sound started. That's a pretty reasonable distance. If you could measure the arrival time to within (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Any news on USB support for linux?
|
|
Hi there, Is there any news on the development of support for the USB IR tower under linux? I found a HOWTO on the net by Ryan Simmons which claims to be able to get the tower working using a patch written by Bret Thaeler. (URL) anyone been able to (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | pbForth vs RCX 1.0
|
|
Hi, Is pbForth fully compatible with RCX 1.0? Can RCX 2.0 communicate with RCX 1.0 in pbForth (using IR ports)? Thanks Mario (23 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: Navigation using landmarks (Was: Re: lasers and RCX)
|
|
This thread seems to have been going on for such a while I've forgotten where it started. Was the original question: how does my robot know where it is in a room? Has anyone suggested ultrasonic (or audio) "beacons" in each corner of the room? The (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | usb under windows
|
|
Hello! I purchased a Mindstorms 2.0 with USB tower half a year ago and now I want to play with it... My computer is running WinMe so I downloaded the winlegos.exe package from the legos page. When running firmdl3 it complains that it can't find the (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | liblnp for windows
|
|
hi there, we have ported liblnp for windows, with vc++ 6.0. the daemon lnpd still has to run under linux. where can we put the source for the benefit of all? michael ps: could it be lnp was broken from legos-0.2.5 to 0.2.6? (23 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Friction on Rotation Sensor
|
|
Yes, Gregory, I'm sure. When I mention the sensor I mean the whole thing, not only the eletronics part. I tested both sensors and I tried to tilt the axle to test the behaviour you mentioned. After playing with it a little, it seens the casing don't (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | pbForth questions
|
|
The output of my compiler typically looks like: \ Begin code sample FORTH CODE ... ... : ENTRYPOINT ... ; 0 ENTRYPOINT \ End code sample Or, in other words, I'm currently (and this isn't permanent) not allowing programs to be compiled that do not (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: OT word definition... (was Re: Rover Programming)
|
|
(...) "Gondolier" I believe it is. (URL) thinhk calling them a pusher may get YOU retired. :-) FUT o-t.fun (23 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | OT word definition... (was Re: Rover Programming)
|
|
Maybe it refers to a gondola, uhm, pilot? Driver? Pole pushing person? Who is either retired or on break. :-) -- Baha Baydar bbaydar@hfx.eastlink.ca ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ralph Hempel" <rhempel@bmts.com> (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Rover Programming
|
|
(...) I meant to write: (...) I'm just making sure that nobody thinks expoling is an actual word. And if it was, I wonder what it would mean? Cheers, Ralph (23 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Rover Programming
|
|
Steve Baker Wrote: (...) I'm going to add a proviso here - when you hit something that you shouldn't have hit! Anyways, this is a very interesting idea, Steve. The bitmap analysis is fine. I don't think any of us with kids and a reasonably large (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Friction on Rotation Sensor
|
|
Are you sure it is the sensor itself? We have found that the axis is often "off" a bit from canonical LEGO spacing, and if built into a structure, binds quite a bit. But if you assemble it so that the body (blue) of the sensor can "float" with (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
