To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / *32863 (-10)
  Re: New MOC: RoboArm I
 
By making a good programming you can control lots of functions with one touch sensor, wich would be complicated but it's possible. I have tried using two touch sensors to control motors, let's say you press the sensor once for motor A, twice for B, (...) (23 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: RIS 2.0 Upgrade Kit content?
 
Mine contained only the software. I bought the USB tower from Lego Dacta. -- Bob Fay THE SHOP (URL) Wang" <lkwang@mail.ncku.edu.tw> wrote in message news:B901594A966879A....edu.tw... (...) (23 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  RIS 2.0 Upgrade Kit content?
 
What are in the 2.0 upgrade kit? Only software, or software and hardware? It is said that it contains a USB IR transmitter. I use NQC, on a Macintosh. Thank you in advance. -- Li-Kai Wang, M.D. Dept. of Anesthesiology, National Cheng Kung University (...) (23 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: New MOC: RoboArm I
 
(...) Yes - you need to thread them though some technic beams along the way. ---...--- Steve Baker ---...--- Mail : <sjbaker1@airmail.net> WorkMail: <sjbaker@link.com> URLs : (8 URLs) (23 years ago, 11-May-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: New MOC: RoboArm I
 
(...) Well, with three touch sensors, you can have (at best) only 8 possibilities at any instant - but with even only one touch sensor, you can input any conceivable command if you have enough time. (Imagine if you entered your commands in morse (...) (23 years ago, 11-May-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: New MOC: RoboArm I
 
I don't know of any other source for the flex axle. I found that they did not turn smoothly. Tend to loft. Maybe they can be contained at several points to stop the whipping action. Micromotors seem to work well in pairs, I guess they unlock each (...) (23 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: New MOC: RoboArm I
 
(...) You should be able to get 3 sensors to control 3 motors like this: Sensor A not pushed = forward Sensor A pushed = reverse Sensor B pushed and not C = Motor 1 Sensor C pushed and not B = Motor 2 Sensor B and C pushed = Motor 3 -Kyle (23 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: New MOC: RoboArm I
 
(...) Thats the exact problem I'm having. I would like to have 1 RCX be able to control the direction of 2 motors. So what I trying to make is a 4 button controller using 3 touch sensors. For instance, I want to have 1 RCX control the opening and (...) (23 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: New MOC: RoboArm I
 
(...) Yes - I agree. I'd avoid using micromotors anyway because of their tendancy to lock up when you put any kind of strain on them. Micromotors are good for little decorative features or small one-time operations that don't need much power. So (...) (23 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: ___cmpsi2
 
(...) OK, I planned to test 0.2.6; this is the right moment to do it. (...) Do you know why? (I'm just curious) (...) Thank you very much. This was really important to me. Eric (23 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR