 | | Re: Motorized landing gear question
|
|
(...) (These are identical to Mindstorms motors - right? Certainly the motors *I* picked up from Znaps sets are indistinguishable from Mindstorms motors ...I don't think they ever shipped a different one with Znaps.) (...) Well, the worm gear should (...) (23 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Motorized landing gear question
|
|
(...) I'd suggest it's not necessary for the landing gear to lift the craft - just to hold it up. If it's only operated while there's no weight on the craft, it becomes much easier, you only need some kind of locking mechanism so the motor isn't (...) (23 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.space, lugnet.znap)
|
|
 | | Re: multiplexor and legOS
|
|
(...) Not bad. But as you say, still vulnerable to the task switching problem. (...) Instead of resorting to that, maybe there is a way to freeze task switching during critical operations. When I owned and programmed the AmigaOS (don't laugh :), (...) (23 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
 | | Motorized landing gear question
|
|
I've been pondering using one of the Znap motors to power a landing gear mechanism strong enough to at least hold, if not lift a decent sized space craft (including the motor and battery box- if possible) Any ideas? I was thinking worm gear and some (...) (23 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.space, lugnet.znap)
|
|
 | | Re: multiplexor and legOS
|
|
#include <sys/time.h> void systime_set_timeslice (unsigned char slice); include/sys/time.h:43-45: #ifdef CONF_TM #define TM_DEFAULT_SLICE 20 file://!< default multitasking timeslice #endif hope that helps, Albert "Michael J Ash" (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
 | | Re: multiplexor and legOS
|
|
(...) I agree about the cause for the msleep granularity, I'd seen the same stuff in tm and assumed that would cause the problem. Sorry my last note was a little unclear, I tried msleep and delay but am now using my own function which seems to (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
 | | Re: Secondary Education Robotics
|
|
(...) Hi, have a look at (URL) is more than two years of work with secundary students. Claude Baumann (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics.edu)
|
|
 | | Re: multiplexor and legOS
|
|
(...) I don't know about this 20ms granularity and how delay() is going to be any better. Here's the code for each function: //! delay execution allowing other tasks to run. /*! \param msec sleep duration in milliseconds \return number of (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
 | | Secondary Education Robotics
|
|
Hi, I'm part of a university group trying to compile a list of ways that robotics are being used in high school classrooms. If you are a person involved with the use of robotics in high school science, math, and technology courses, and are (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics.edu)
|
|
 | | Re: multiplexor and legOS
|
|
(...) Thanks, I'd suspected that msleep might not be very accurate but never considered that it's true granularity could be so large. I did a quick test with my current configuration and when I asked msleep to sleep for 12ms it slept for 20. This (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
 | | Re: Question?
|
|
(...) No, there's no bridge in the RCX, just a pull-up to 5V (10kOhm IIRC). If you look at the schematics (say at (URL) see that there is another bridge rectifier in the sensor between ground and the raw sensor output. The ground half of the bridge (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: true tcp/ip on the RCX
|
|
(...) The C64 server survived the "Slashdot attack" without problems, even though it served tenths of thousands of pages over a period of only a few hours. Since it is configured to allow only 10 simultaneous connections, it could more or less serve (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
 | | Re: JAVA for 9751 Lego interface - SOS
|
|
(...) It seems this thing connects to a serial port. So you need a Java interface to the serial port like rcxcomm, and you need to write a few classes that talk to the thing (see (URL) would be nice to have some common abstractions of the RCX (...) (23 years ago, 3-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: multiplexor and legOS
|
|
(...) Don't ask me for a cite, but I seem to remember something about msleep only having 20ms granularity. If that's the case, your msleep(10) is either not sleeping at all or is sleeping 20ms, either one of which could cause problems. I'd suggest (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
 | | Re: Question?
|
|
(...) My guess (having never looked at the schematics, or taken one apart) is that when connected backwards, "dark" would be 0V and "light" would be -8V. Again, a simple bridge rectifier (this time in the RCX) would get it sorted out. It might be (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Question?
|
|
(...) What I don't understand is how this works if the sensor is connected backwards. Sure, a bridge rectifier will get the power sorted out but how does the sensor send back a voltage in the right range? If say "light" is 8V and "dark" is 0V then (...) (23 years ago, 3-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: multiplexor and legOS
|
|
well anyone who looked at the code I attached may have notcied that I had one of the msleeps commented out. Oops, with this now uncommented I at least see the second and third light sensors pulse on, but only for an extremely short time. Suring the (...) (23 years ago, 3-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
 | | This week in Robotics:
|
|
THIS WEEK IN ROBOTICS: Here is a calendar of events coming up this week - February 2rd - 9th, 2002. Details are on our web site at (URL) you know of an upcoming event of have a robotics club or organization, please drop us a note at (...) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Power to RCX
|
|
Regarding the data sheet for the Melexis MLX1040B that everyone is talking about, and which I've been looking for for years.... This link: (...) (URL) comes back as NOT FOUND The fact that some people are claiming to have seen it implies that it was (...) (24 years ago, 3-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
|
 | | Vision Command $29.99 @KB Toys online
|
|
FYI - at least their markdowns are sometimes worthwhile. This was online through what used to be eToys - any KB toys should work. Almost as cheap as the eToys markdowns. There's still the Windows 98 requirement but...... (24 years ago, 2-Feb-02, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.robotics)
|