 | | robolife
|
|
My old project .... Can i have some remark about it ? nanobapt ---...--- "la cuillère n'existe pas" (URL) : 94470030 (24 years ago, 28-Dec-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | legOS
|
|
No one use legOS, no one can send me examples ?? nanobapt ---...--- "la cuillère n'existe pas" (URL) : 94470030 (24 years ago, 28-Dec-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: install ris2 on win95?
|
|
I don't know the answer, but what I know is that the USB support on WIN95 (even the latest edition) is quiet limited and bad. Migrating to windows 98 is just a small step and will give you full and good working USB support. Stef Mientki (...) (24 years ago, 28-Dec-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: How to make shared memory....not
|
|
Hi Steve, (...) Yes. Actually, I am working on a robot that finds a path trough a maze. After solving the maze, a second program can run through the maze with the informations from the first program. (I will do this with shared mem). Both programs (...) (24 years ago, 28-Dec-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
 | | install ris2 on win95?
|
|
hi list! does anybody happen to run r.i.s 2.0 on windows 95? now i went through all the troubles of soldering an usb connector (my mobo was prepared for usb, but without plugs) and installing usb support for win95, and now the r.i.s setup is telling (...) (24 years ago, 28-Dec-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: RIS 2.0
|
|
(...) Did your nitpick need to be posted to everyone? I was more happy to read about a possible sale than your complaint. Couldn't you have sent your comment as a private e-mail? (Yes, I know I become a hypocrit(sp?) with this post...) Eric (24 years ago, 28-Dec-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: RIS 2.0
|
|
Did that really need to be annouced to everyone?... i mean, it's not that many people care about the sale you found. Couldn't you just post in the califoria section. geez... (24 years ago, 28-Dec-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: RIS 2.0
|
|
The Target in Watsonville, CA has the RIS 2.0 on sell for 139.99, they also have alot of other sets for 30% off. The sale ends Saturday. Gary Don't forget to look at my brickshelf pictures: (URL) (24 years ago, 28-Dec-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Target Sale
|
|
The Target in Watsonville, CA has the RIS 2.0 on sell for 139.99, they also have alot of other sets for 30% off. Gary Don't forget to take a look at my brickshelf pictures: (URL) (24 years ago, 28-Dec-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Lego patents
|
|
(...) Not at all. What I'm saying is that just putting a bunch of LEGO bricks together does not qualify something as a device which can be patented. Now if that LEGO construction can remove cancerous tumours without leaving any scars.... now that's (...) (24 years ago, 28-Dec-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Mindstorms on RailRoad?
|
|
How about Solar powered? (URL) the bottom of the page. -- Bob Fay THE SHOP (URL) Baker" <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> wrote in message news:3C2BB0AB.17BC05...ail.net... (...) the (...) from (...) (24 years ago, 28-Dec-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Mindstorms on RailRoad?
|
|
(...) Hmmm - yes - that might actually work...although now you'd have the RCX's power going out to the rails - so you can't run two such robots at the same time. :-( ---...--- Steve Baker ---...--- Mail : <sjbaker1@airmail.net> WorkMail: (...) (24 years ago, 27-Dec-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Product Derivatives
|
|
(...) ...what license? There is no license on a box of Lego bricks? Perhaps the Lego *software* - but you don't have to use that. Use LegOS and GNU C++ if you are concerned about that. ---...--- Steve Baker ---...--- Mail : <sjbaker1@airmail.net> (...) (24 years ago, 27-Dec-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | LNPD: communication between clients
|
|
It seems that when a client of lnpd sends data to the IR tower, these are not sent to the other clients connected to the daemon. Unfortunately, I really need this feature... So I tried to call "deliver_packet(tx_buffer, tx_end-tx_buffer);" in (...) (24 years ago, 28-Dec-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
 | | RE: Product Derivatives
|
|
Based on my reading of the license agreement we agree to in using Legos products, they claim ALL rights to anything derived from the use of the software or products and anything developed can have NO COMMERCIAL IMPLICATIONS. For this reason I have (...) (24 years ago, 27-Dec-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Mindstorms on RailRoad?
|
|
(...) Yup, that would work too. Sometimes good deals can be had on these if you keep your eyes open. Especially on the blue ones if you're not fussy about color. (...) That seems to work a lot better for picking motion up from the rails than for (...) (24 years ago, 27-Dec-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.trains)
|
|
 | | Re: Mindstorms on RailRoad?
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> (...) Why not use the old 4.5volt rails? (Presuming Steve has or can get some...) Or, as for driving it, could the setup from the 4533 'track snow remover' (URL) used by driving the middle axle? I (...) (24 years ago, 27-Dec-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.trains)
|
|
 | | Re: Mindstorms on RailRoad?
|
|
(...) No problem, then. (that wasn't what you asked at first, you complained that the train motor took power from the track...) In that case just put *no* power on the rails (that is, run on some track not connected to any power) and feed one of the (...) (24 years ago, 27-Dec-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.trains)
|
|
 | | Re: Mindstorms on RailRoad?
|
|
(...) Lego (...) Isn't that the seme thing? If you modify the train motor to accept power from the RCX, you have wheels that roll nicely on the train track. Anyway, have you tried the small yellow/white wheels that come with the solid rubber tires? (...) (24 years ago, 27-Dec-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Mindstorms on RailRoad?
|
|
(...) I don't mind that the RCX is battery powered - I want to make a robot that happens to run on rails rather than some long running train that happens to have an RCX onboard. I don't really want to use the train motor at all (modified or not). (...) (24 years ago, 27-Dec-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|