 | | A few questions on NQC vs. VB
|
|
Hi all. I've been lurking in the shadows reading posts for a couple of weeks and now have a question of my own. I'd like to move beyond the programming capabilities of the RIS software and am trying to decide which way to go. I have VERY little (...) (26 years ago, 26-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: LegOS 0.2.0a multi-threading problem
|
|
(...) [snip] Heh. I've spent 2 days on this, so I know how you feel :). main() must be the first function in your source file, otherwise really weird stuff happens. -- Regards, Modemch (26 years ago, 25-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RCX with AC power - Still Available
|
|
Hi. Yes I mostly lurk, but what a great listserv this is!! I recently acquired a Robolab for my 8th grade science classes - WAY COOL. Also, I recently went to a Lego sponsored training workshop, where the Lego Rep. tells me that you can still get (...) (26 years ago, 26-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: A few questions on NQC vs. VB
|
|
Zac, I may not understand your objectives, but I'd say that using NQC with the Rcx Command Center RcxCC is the current best choice for work that is primarily concerned with programming the Rcx and Robots. You'll find it very easy to use, and there's (...) (26 years ago, 26-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | RE: A few questions on NQC vs. VB
|
|
(...) After seeing all the cool stuff at Mindfest this weekend, I'll say this: 1. Learn about basic bot building using the graphical tools from LEGO 2. When you need more control, go to NQC 3. When you run out of variables or timers, etc go to (...) (26 years ago, 26-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: A few questions on NQC vs. VB
|
|
(...) I'd recommend NQC; if you use visual basic, you'll need to go through a lot of communicating-with-the-brick and user-interface crap every time you want to make a program. With NQC, you concentrate on writing your code for the robot, and don't (...) (26 years ago, 26-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: A few questions on NQC vs. VB
|
|
Hi Zac, Dave Baum's NQC is excellent ... not quite the capabilities of pbForth, but *much* easier to learn. Mark Overmars' RCX-CC makes NQC even easier to use ... and best of all, both Dave and Mark have made their efforts available for use free of (...) (26 years ago, 26-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | RCX Mower (was RCX with AC power - Still Available)
|
|
You wouldn't necessarily have to map the lawn. Just let it go around randomly. A purely random algorithm would have a tendency to miss corners, though. You could do something random, but add a bias of some kind to help it get the corners of your (...) (26 years ago, 26-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX with AC power - Still Available
|
|
James C. Jones <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> wrote in message news:v01540b02b43b87...121.26]... (...) Yea, but they want something like $150 compared to $200 for a RCX and a whole lot of parts with the RIS. (26 years ago, 26-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Kevin Loch's pictures from Mindfest.
|
|
I just wanted to make sure that those of you that don't follow the lugnet.org group saw that Kevin Loch has posted his pictures from Mindfest on his site. There are some great pictures here even though they are a little small. (URL) is Kevin's (...) (26 years ago, 26-Oct-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.robotics)
|
