 | | 2 mega-pixel digital cameras —Huw Millington
|
| | | I persuaded my boss to update the digital camera we use at work, so I went and purchased an Olympus Camedia C-2000. This new camera is a 2 million pixel job meaning it photographs at 1600x1200. Naturally I felt obliged to give it a road-test, so (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jul-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 2 mega-pixel digital cameras —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | (...) Digital cameras are all about NiMH rechargables. (25 years ago, 17-Jul-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: 2 mega-pixel digital cameras —Terry Keller
|
| | | | | (...) Those do look great. I would like to get the new Nikon Coolpix 950, which is similar in price and features, I believe. (...) I recall seeing a test/review of the C-2000 and that Nikon, and I think they did mention that the C-2000 seemed to use (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jul-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 2 mega-pixel digital cameras —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | | (...) Yeah, I've been looking into digital cameras recently (in fantasy-shopping mode, sadly), and the Coolpix 950 is my top choice. And in the lower price category, if you don't need zoom, the Coolpix 700 seems totally the best choice. (25 years ago, 19-Jul-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2 mega-pixel digital cameras —Terry Keller
|
| | | | | | (...) Ahh.... Fantasy Shopping Mode. I am well-aquainted with that. -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 19-Jul-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: 2 mega-pixel digital cameras —Lee Jorgensen
|
| | | | My wife recently purchased a Kodak Advantix system camera ... in the documentation was a Kodak FD-300 ... Film Drive that can take a processed roll of film and scan it in ... supposedly (according to the docs) it will produce a 2300x1500 dpi which (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jul-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2 mega-pixel digital cameras —John Neal
|
| | | | | Digital camera shoppers! Check this out. Might be a viable option to dropping (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jul-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 2 mega-pixel digital cameras —Terry Keller
|
| | | | | | (...) Kodaks 'PhotoCD' idea. Might be good if it costs less that PhotoCD did. The problem is, that you still have to take the photographs, take the roll to be developed, then wait to get the disc. It isn't the same as digital. At heart, it is still (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jul-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2 mega-pixel digital cameras —Terry Keller
|
| | | | | (...) Basically, it is just a transparency (negative) scanner. But one that takes the Advantix cartidge and does its work inside the box. But you still have to have the cartridge developed *first*. So you are not getting away from that developing (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jul-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2 mega-pixel digital cameras —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) Equivelent in some ways, but lacking the main advantage: you can instantly see your results and delete bad pictures right away. And pictures are basically free. This means you can (and psychologically it's easier to) take 10x as many pictures (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jul-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
