Subject:
|
Re: 2 mega-pixel digital cameras
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Mon, 19 Jul 1999 12:20:40 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
MATTDM@MATTDM.stopspamORG
|
Viewed:
|
775 times
|
| |
|
|
Lee Jorgensen <ljorgensen@zephyrtech.com> wrote:
> which they claim is equivalent to a 4-MegaPixel digital camera ...
Equivelent in some ways, but lacking the main advantage: you can instantly
see your results and delete bad pictures right away. And pictures are
basically free. This means you can (and psychologically it's easier to) take
10x as many pictures as you might with a film camera. Not that you really
want that many more finally, but your chances of getting great shots are
increased by that much.
Plus, color printers are getting pretty good too, if you need hard copy.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 2 mega-pixel digital cameras
|
| My wife recently purchased a Kodak Advantix system camera ... in the documentation was a Kodak FD-300 ... Film Drive that can take a processed roll of film and scan it in ... supposedly (according to the docs) it will produce a 2300x1500 dpi which (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jul-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
