 | | Re: Whats up with BrickShelf mods?
|
|
(...) Excellent advice! Also (and my bad for not realising this sooner) the thread probably belongs in lugnet.publish, rather than lugnet.general since that group tends to get a lot of Brickshelf related discussion. There is not a group devoted to (...) (20 years ago, 5-Sep-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Print Shop?
|
|
Does anyone in the community either own or manage a print shop? I'm looking to do a large volume of printing for an upcoming LEGO-related event, and several LEGO-related promotions over the next year. I'm in the process of determining what will be (...) (20 years ago, 4-Sep-04, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general, lugnet.events)
|
| |
| | Re: Happy Birthday Brickshelf!
|
|
(...) Wow, how did I get so high on your list? :-O -Tim (20 years ago, 4-Sep-04, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Happy Birthday Brickshelf!
|
|
(...) 246 - Tim Courtney, of course. e (20 years ago, 4-Sep-04, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Happy Birthday Brickshelf!
|
|
(...) I believe the timeline goes something like: April 19th 1998 - kl.net first hosts catalog/instruction scans August 31st 1999 - kl.net becomes "BrickShelf" February 10th 2000 - BrickShelf starts hosting personal galleries February 22nd 2002 - (...) (20 years ago, 3-Sep-04, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Happy Birthday Brickshelf!
|
|
(...) But what is your 246th favorite thing? Bruce (20 years ago, 3-Sep-04, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Copyright question
|
|
(...) Hey, I got your attention... :-P (...) So where should I sent my comments about the book? I used you Bricks on the Brain address last time. Don't worry, these are serious comments on some of the chapters. (...) I'd love to, but I need to get (...) (20 years ago, 3-Sep-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Happy Birthday Brickshelf!
|
|
(...) Wow, Brickshelf is like my 247th Favorite thing in the universe. Happy Service Date Binary Sequence, you magnifient bunch of bits. e (20 years ago, 3-Sep-04, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Happy Birthday Brickshelf!
|
|
(...) Hi all, Someone was just asking on FBTB how old brickshelf was, and a quick Lugnet search found this post above, dated August 31, 1999. Does this mean that Tuesday was Brickshelf's 5th birthday? If so, happy birthday, Kevin! Bruce (20 years ago, 3-Sep-04, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: I hate MOCPages
|
|
(...) At least registered users, with a real name. A donation will sort out a lot more than I would want, I think. (...) Less comments is ok with me. There are only two comments I like for my MOCs: - Simply positive messgaes "Gee that's great" or (...) (20 years ago, 2-Sep-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: LENNI Additions to RSS/Atom spec - preliminary proposal
|
|
(...) Looks like about Aurora OR to me. (20 years ago, 2-Sep-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Definitive list of LEGO Themes needed
|
|
I'm in search of a two things, and I bet some helpful persons here can provide: A definitive list of LEGO product themes; As comprehensive a list of fan-derived groupings, themes, and sub-themes as possible. Why? What a question. 'Cuz. OK, I really (...) (20 years ago, 2-Sep-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LENNI Additions to RSS/Atom spec - preliminary proposal
|
|
(...) That's one of my concerns as well. It is a nifty idea, but it's pretty far outside the original scope of the project. Parsing latitude/longitude (and distances between two points) implies a level of complexity well above a simple XML text (...) (20 years ago, 2-Sep-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: LENNI Additions to RSS/Atom spec - preliminary proposal
|
|
"Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:20040901134145....ron.com... (...) It would indeed, although the task of determining the co-ordinates falls upon the publisher, and it is not that easy a task for the novice. There are (...) (20 years ago, 1-Sep-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: LENNI Additions to RSS/Atom spec - preliminary proposal
|
|
(...) Does this solve the "what's near me" problem? Perhaps there's an API someplace that will help figure that out? (...) I figure the same web-app could be written to generate lat/long? Maybe that's not so easy to do, I haven't looked it up? ... (...) (20 years ago, 1-Sep-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: LENNI Additions to RSS/Atom spec - preliminary proposal
|
|
(...) We could use this format, but it's a little bit harder for computers to parse. Not a big deal, especially for perl (of course :), but maybe we want to go with a more machine-friendly format? 2004-08-30T12:00:00Z This would be the equivilent of (...) (20 years ago, 1-Sep-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: LENNI Additions to RSS/Atom spec - preliminary proposal
|
|
(...) I did an hour of surfing today, and came up with a few things, none of which really strikes me as being perfect. The most easily-implemented regional listing is the ISO-3166-2 standard: (URL) (Click "Local ISO codes" next to the country in (...) (20 years ago, 1-Sep-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: LENNI Additions to RSS/Atom spec - preliminary proposal
|
|
An excellent start Kelly. As publisher of RSS for Brickset and brickish.org, here are my comments. (...) I'd vote for once at the top. I appreciate that its inclusion potentially opens up lenni for use by others, but given that much of the spec (...) (20 years ago, 31-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: LENNI Additions to RSS/Atom spec - preliminary proposal
|
|
Great comments, thanks! To recap, here's what I'm gleaning from the comments. I agree with 1-4, am shaky on 5, like leaving 6 alone, need more info for 7, and like the optimism of 8. 1. Namespace "lenni" in lower case - since XML tags are by (...) (20 years ago, 31-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: LENNI Additions to RSS/Atom spec - preliminary proposal
|
|
(Bah! Have to use the web interface, which means I can't reply to all three posts I wanted to in one post. Copied from my Sent folder. ) (...) In general, I wouldn't limit us to only Item level elements. That might be a guideline for implementation, (...) (20 years ago, 31-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
