|
One of the beauties of the 5x5 pixel idea is that there is no cost. It would
simply be a small selection of pixels that would be put into the image by the
author into a field of like colored pixels. this allows for about 32 million
different watermarks with a 25 pixel area this is even enough to allow a sub
clasification mark that could be used to further authenticate the models.
This could be done by reducing the field to 4x5 and setting aside the other
five pixels as a sub designation allowing 32 sub models and still leaving us
with over a million watermarks. Yeah lego will probably never check these but
this could prove a useful system if the rights to a picture do ever become
disputed. The only administrative task associated with this is to create a
repository for the watermarks. Maybe a watermark could be given upon lugnet
membership that prvides an easy way of keeping track of them. Like I said I'm
just throwing some ideas out there
-Adam
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Picture piracy on lego.com
|
| "Bram Lambrecht" <BXL34@po.cwru.edu> wrote in message news:MABBIBJJFOJIOHD...wru.edu... (...) never (...) Yeah. But if Artemis ever does become a reality - the new file format could be encoded and a 'parts author status' could be granted and (...) (24 years ago, 5-Sep-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.cad, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|