 | | Re: Publishing DAT files (was Re: B-Wing DAT file)
|
|
(...) They are useful ONLY for people who have the ability to view them. For the rest of us, they are as non-useful as binaries in a textual group. What is the population of LDraw vs non-LDraw users? The one .DAT that was posted was a LONG, (...) (26 years ago, 12-Oct-98, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Publishing DAT files (was Re: B-Wing DAT file)
|
|
(...) Hmm, I'm wondering... What if it were "OK and acceptable" to post .DAT files in any group, as long as they were accompanied by commentary? I can see them being useful in a discussion of castles, or space ships, or other areas where someone (...) (26 years ago, 12-Oct-98, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Publishing DAT files (was Re: B-Wing DAT file)
|
|
(...) lugnet.cad.dat sounds BEST to me. I can simply not subscribe then :) WHile staying subscribed to lugnet.cad since I DO want to learn how to use L-CAD Sarah Heacock sarah@eskimo.com (26 years ago, 12-Oct-98, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Publishing DAT files (was Re: B-Wing DAT file)
|
|
(...) How about if there were a group lugnet.cad.dat and it required that the Followup-To field be set (to something else, usually lugnet.cad)? --Todd (26 years ago, 12-Oct-98, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Publishing DAT files (was Re: B-Wing DAT file)
|
|
(...) I think this is good. I am poised to publish a Dat as soon as I here from Moz about a rendering he is putting on his site for me. This was my plan: In Lugnet.robotics and Lugnet.build, I was going to post a commentary on the model and a link (...) (26 years ago, 12-Oct-98, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Publishing DAT files (was Re: B-Wing DAT file)
|
|
(...) if (...) there (...) I'll wait, I'm waiting to hear from Moz anyway. LINC (26 years ago, 12-Oct-98, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Publishing DAT files (was Re: B-Wing DAT file)
|
|
(...) Well, there's not lugnet.cad.dat group yet, so the closest thing would be lugnet.cad -- certainly OK to post the DAT file there today. The scripting for the followups is going to be simple to write, but will need an hour or maybe more of (...) (26 years ago, 12-Oct-98, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Publishing DAT files (was Re: B-Wing DAT file)
|
|
lugnet.cad.dat gets my vote. If I'm in a mood to see other's models, I'd like a one-stop place to go. Conversely, lugnet.cad.dat will get left off on my PalmPC's download list, allowing me to use the ram for more lugnet.cad related messages. -gyug (...) (26 years ago, 13-Oct-98, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Publishing DAT files (was Re: B-Wing DAT file)
|
|
(...) Roit -- Good thinkin'. Also, a separate dedicated .dat area would pretty much eliminate all possible "hmm, should I clutter up the .cad group with my model?" types of inhibitions... --Todd (26 years ago, 13-Oct-98, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Publishing DAT files (was Re: B-Wing DAT file)
|
|
Wow... Fancy server. I would not expect the server to be able to do all of this. But if you can make it do so, more power to you! Sarah (...) (26 years ago, 13-Oct-98, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Publishing DAT files (was Re: B-Wing DAT file)
|
|
(...) Here are my current thoughts on attributes of a lugnet.cad.dat group: The server... 1) ...should reject an article addressed to lugnet.cad.dat which does not contain LDraw .DAT data. 2) ...should reject an article containing LDraw .DAT data (...) (26 years ago, 13-Oct-98, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Publishing DAT files (was Re: B-Wing DAT file)
|
|
(...) Oops -- one mod to that -- it should *require* .DAT data in lugnet.cad.dat, but not deny it in lugnet.cad -- it should *allow* .DAT data in lugnet.cad. Reason: Because some .DAT files won't be models -- they'll be works in progress wanting (...) (26 years ago, 13-Oct-98, to lugnet.publish)
|
