Subject:
|
Re: Lego disclaimers on sites
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish, lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Tue, 7 Mar 2000 00:03:53 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
suz@baseplate.%Spamless%com
|
Viewed:
|
1806 times
|
| |
|
|
Shiri Dori wrote:
[...]
> But how many people were actually contacted by TLC regarding their sites?
Impossible to know.
> And what did TLC ask you, specifically, to do? [...]
Below are my facts as described (some years ago) when I dropped my
domain name. Note, the Fair Play document has since moved to: www.lego.com/info/fair.asp
http://www.baseplate.com/change.html
-Suz.
----------------------
sad update:
Because Lego failed to pick up my domain name (pay to hold it), it was
auto-grabbed by a "nasty pointer" once available.
This continues to upset me. Many who bookmarked my old URL were
children, or sites for children. For a year (?), those kids were
exposed to porn at a lego-like domain -- instead of my squeaky clean
lego-fan site.
Either Lego failed to follow up, or didn't think they'd need to.
I don't understand who/how has it now. It's parked.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Lego disclaimers on sites
|
| (FUT .publish) OK, one last thing for the day. I was wondering about disclaimers on lego sites. I know it's pretty cutomary to put up disclaimers on fan-made sites, and part of the lego fair-play policy (IIRC). But how many people were actually (...) (25 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
