To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.peopleOpen lugnet.people in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 People / 2809
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) well, I know it's Jan 2nd, but I didn't get a chance to generate it yesterday... So here it is: 7815 total posts. 574 unique names. SORTED BY FREQUENCY Todd Lehman: 1092 Mladen Pejic: 323 Eric Sophie: 303 Mark Sandlin: 232 Larry Pieniazek: 225 (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)  
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) ::homer voice:: woohoo! I'm a noisemaker! lol. Thanx for the new list, dan. -Jay (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) This is for what time period? CANNOT be the whole year of 2001 right?? or does it filter some groups out? (...) Less than a post a day? I don't think so. (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) what was I thinking! must have not recovered from new years yet... 121335 posts - redoing the rest of the stats... sorry for the goof... Dan (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
Dan, please tell me I'm confused and not reading this right. A year ago Todd posted this: (...) have (...) And now this year you have posted this: (...) yesterday... (...) Does this really mean that posters have dropped from about 3000 to just over (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
"Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:GpBMn1.1BE@lugnet.com... (...) Ok this is lookin better. I posted my last post just after you sent this. -Jon (sigh of relief) -- | The Galactic Shipyard - (URL) My website - (URL) BrickBay Store - (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) nono, my mistake. should have looked at the numbers before posting. working on a repost. :/ Dan (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) that's OK. I posted 2 times. Ya. Right. James P (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) ok, this time it looks better: 121335 Posts, 2298 Unique names. SORTED BY FREQUENCY Larry Pieniazek 3739 Todd Lehman 1741 Frank Filz 1708 Mark Sandlin 1664 Ross Crawford 1554 Lindsay Frederick Braun 1288 Scott Arthur 1271 Matthew Gerber 1217 (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp) !! 
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) Hmmm ... last year we had 31 people with over a thousand posts, and this year only 9. Plus the overall number has gone down - any ideas what this is attributed to? The newness of Lugnet wearing off? I wonder if the hits are higher than last (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)  
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) 8th place!?!?! Oh holy cripes...Jill's gonna' kill me! I really had NO idea I posted here quite this often...I assume that this list isn't filtered for crossposts, right? So there's a CHANCE that I'm at least out of the top ten? GEEZ! Matt (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) Most likely it's due to the new posting verification rules. It's been discussed that overall posting is significantly down since the email verification kicked in. Adrian (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) Todd's list last year was a list for all posts since September 1998, IIRC. I may be slacking, but there's no way I posted half as much this year as last. But I think you're right in that some of the "newness" has faded. As far as MOC's are (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) yesterday... (...) Thanks Dan! (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) It would be interesting to update last years list, so a comparision between now and last year can be made. -- Terry K -- (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) Rather Scary. 20 people post over a fifth of the messages here. :-o Scott A (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
"Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:GpBx9D.CMy@lugnet.com... (...) yesterday... (...) <snip> (...) <snip> (...) <snip> In a way this is kinda deceptive because I used Ken's name for a bit after he died untill I was able to get mine (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) Does this include the nightly activity posts under Todd's name? Still, to be #3.... I'd better not let my boss see that... Frank (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) yup, just counting X-Real-Life-Name headers. Dan (22 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
AHHHH! I didn't know I posted THAT much! I'm 13th! Josh (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) Wow! I thought I'd have many more pots than this, but once I factor in the 4 months I was offline this number makes a bit more sense. Still....enough slacking off, I'm WAY behind Lar this year. ;) -Dave (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
Dan Boger <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:GpBx9D.CMy@lugnet.com... (...) yesterday... (...) Yikes!!! I never would have thought to get into the 200s let alone this. Cool. Gary (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) Perhaps you should spend more money on pots than Lego 8?) Unless it was some other kind of pot you're talking about 8?/ ROSCO FUT .o-t.fun (22 years ago, 5-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) Yow. I've been missing for six months and I'm _still_ on this list? The rest of y'all are all slack! :) -JDF [As much testing to see if I've got posting set up right on this box as I am making fun of y'all's slack. :) ] (22 years ago, 9-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) Hehe. I wouldn't bet on it Matt, you post a *lot*! But there's nothing wrong with that... even as 8th place you posted a lot less than the top twenty last your, I think (too lazy to check). As someone here pointed out, last year had many (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) yesterday... (...) <snip the next 999 noisemakers...> LOL, Brian K.'s post in b-s-t has reminded me, it's just about that time of year again-- Todd? or Dan, if Todd is too busy? Maggie C. (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
(...) ok, here it is. Like last time, only people who posted from the web interface were counted - it's too much of a pain to deal with parsing email addresses for unique ids. So as /. says, if you use these numbers for anything at all, you're out (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.admin.statistics) !! 
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
Dan Boger wrote in message <20021230055017.GA10...on.com>... (...) That can't be so - I'm on the list at 413 posts, and I post via newsreader, not the web. Kevin ---...--- NEW Half-Timbered Shops kit 1400+++ pieces! (URL) TOWN PLANNING information: (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
Thanks to both Maggie for the reminder, and *Dan for the compilation. I like the fact that I’ve posted more than Suz for the past 2 years! …it make me feel somewhat kinda special… ;) <blushes> (...) These figures are a gauge of my self-worth… (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
(...) Yeah! I'm # 16. Good for my first 11 months. Off to make more noise. *Noise*...*noise*...*noise*... -JHK (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
"Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:20021230055017....ron.com... (...) <snipped list> (...) Woo Hoo number 44! Wait a second, I've never posted from the web interface! Huh. I'm happy anyway. :) <snipped list> -- Thanx~ Nicole Drumm (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
"Kevin Wilson" <kwilson_tccs@compuserve.com> wrote in message news:H7x5J1.GvK@lugnet.com... (...) Me too Kevin. I'm happy to be in the top 50 :). -- Thanx~ Nicole Drumm MS (URL) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
(...) well, somehow your posts got an X-Real-Life-Name header. Perhaps your newsreader was configured to add it? Dan (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers & Review
 
Cool! I doubled what I did the previous year. Of course, I am a long way from Larry still. ...Waitaminute, the year isn't over yet. I still have 38 hours to post 2134 more times!! 8-P Anyway, how about a year-in-review, to see what all these posts (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
(...) Wow... the number of my posts has halved in the last year. In 2001, I posted 1150 times. -Tim (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
(...) I'm using the 'post figures' as -points-earned!- ¯¯¯...¯¯¯ ~Once you reach 10,000 points y’get a free trip to LegoLand!!! (I'm sure TLC will honor this…) ;p Mr. #31, --==Richard==-- P.S. !!!Go rtlToronto!!! We’ve got the highest number of (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
Welcome clansmen! I bid you greetings from the ‘Circle of 18 Richards!’ We are a numerous bunch, and soon we will be poised to rule over these fair lands once more. Our high-commander, Richard Marchetti, shall be saluted as ‘post-master’ 1 of 18 (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.general, lugnet.fun.community)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
(...) [...] So I'm #8? Whoopee, I think. I post the majority of messages through NNTP, but I do post the occasional one through the web interface (such as this one). But I know I didn't post 867 through the web interface, so I think you may have (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
(...) Perhaps the authentication process adds it? James (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
(...) Hmm...no. 22. Thought I made more noise than that... Ah well, always next year! :) <<_Matt Hein_>> Fellow lego enthusiast (22 years ago, 1-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
(...) In Windoze, click in the textfield then press [Ctrl] + [A], that is the default Select All keyboard command. Best Mr. #21 (remove SPAM when e-mailing) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.people)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
(...) Woo hoo, #698! (just thought I'd offer a slightly larger number than most who have replied). Then again, I only started posted a couple months ago. -Greg "Fox" Cook (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
(...) If you don't want to delete all the quoted message, but just the list (or any other time you're trying to delete stuff en masse), just put the cursor at the start of the first line-to-be-deleted, hold down shift, and tap (or hold) page down (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.people)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
(...) Thanks for the help Tobbe! I liked it when you wrote: Mr. #21 (is it jus’ me or does this sound really Japanese) <Mista numba twenty-onee> ;p Your fellow compatriot Mr. #31! --==Richard==-- (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.people)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
(...) Thanks so much, I'll try this next time! I really appreciate yours and Tobbe’s assistance…I was beginning to think that nobody would help. Obliged, --==Richard==-- (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.people)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
Wow. I jumped from being tied for last last year (with 1 post) (I'd just gotten my membership), to 20th this year (with 592 posts). With that rate of growth, I'll squash Larry's numbers by Ground Hog's Day. Happy New Year's, all. Bruce Hietbrink (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
(...) As a matter of fact I myself thought I'd be a good rocket (went from two posts to 21st place) and before I fell asleep last nigth I thought it would be cool to make a list with the biggest rockets from 2002. So I made that. Due to the fact I (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)  
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
(...) What I find most bizarre is how consistent the majority of posters are, the number of us who are within 0 or 1 of last years total is freakish. I imagine this is mostly down to the amount of time we each have to surf Lugnet. Psi (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
(...) Mine too - I got 147 posts, and I only ever post using Outlook Express! Go Microsoft!!! (j/k) ;-) Cheers, Paul (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
(...) I'm not quite sure I follow you, but as I did the list I found _a_lot_ of people that either did not post at all or only a few posts in 2001 that had a fair amount of posts in 2002. Of course I took away everyone who posted less then 50 times (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
(...) ... (...) ... (...) ... Tobbe, I'm not as big a rocket as you might suggest. I think that you may have used the wrong list from 2001. As I recall, Dan Boger posted two lists; the first one was incorrect. correct 2001 list (URL) Clark 193 (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
(...) I think you may have a problem with your information for 2001. I posted more than 19 times and I am pretty sure Larry posted more than the 225 times you reported for him. Jude (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
(...) Yes, it has been pointed out to me Dan posted two versions of the 2001 list and I used the incorrect one. I'll see if I can rework the whole thing later today or in the weekend. Best, /Tobbe (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
(...) Oops, my mistake. Since I know I posted more than 1 message in 2001 I didn't twig that the first numerical column wasn't the difference!. (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
(...) The list used incorrect values for 2001, se a new and improved list here (moved to new thread for convinience): (URL) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
(...) Jude Beaudin 19 490 471 (...) The list used incorrect values for 2001, se a new and improved list here (moved to new thread for convinience): (URL) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
The list used incorrect values for 2001, se a new and improved list here (moved to new thread for convinience): (URL) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
(...) And from 2001: (...) Hmm, I'm still number 3 but quite a few less posts... I wonder how much of this is my trying harder to stay out of off-topic.debate. I post mostly from NNTP, but I think NNTP posters get a X-Real-Life-Name added by Lugnet (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
(...) Even a little faster: Click just before the first character you want to delete. Use the mouse to scroll down to the end of the message. Hold the shift key, and click just after the stuff you want to delete. Hit the delete or back arrow keys. (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.people)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
Frank Filz wrote in message <3E1B44AB.D80811B3@m...ng.com>... (...) Even faster, if you know you want to highlight right to the end of the message: position the cursor where you want to start highlighting Hold down Ctrl and Shift and press End. (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jan-03, to lugnet.people)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
(...) And note that either way you select your huge chunk, you can use shift and cursor keys to adjust the end of the selection. You can also re-adjust the end with a shift mouse-click. FUT: lugnet.off-topic.geek (21 years ago, 8-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
(...) If I'd only known what I'd be starting! Heh. A) Yeah, good mouse tactic, but I dislike using the mouse unless I have to. B) I always forget the exact keycombo for straight to the end, thanks. C) yep. but that goes without saying. OR DOES IT? (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
 
(...) No prob. Always looking to spread more efficient Windows usage tips. -Greg "Fox" Cook (21 years ago, 9-Jan-03, to lugnet.people)

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR