To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.partsOpen lugnet.parts in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Parts / *36 (-20)
  Re: Wow!
 
(...) Oh. You mean a comment like that can't be accompanied by a picture of the wistfully dreamed of part ..... ;) JB (22 years ago, 4-Aug-04, to lugnet.parts)
 
  Re: Do you mind if I modify the topic? (Larry Puns Again)
 
(...) Here's a neat little trick someone taught me about using the thumbnails automatically generated by Brickshelf. Add /thumb/image.jpg(und...)thumb.jpg and you will link to the thumb instead of the full image. So: (URL) Better yet, make the (...) (22 years ago, 4-Aug-04, to lugnet.parts.mod, FTX)
 
  Re: Right on Schedule
 
(...) "2 - Did you think to yourself “AND Rob Hendrix...“?" Your answer juxtaposed with Larry's question still don't make the slightest ounce of sense. :-) -->Bruce<-- p.s. you two are the guys screwing up my correctly directed post. :-) p.p.s. See! (...) (22 years ago, 4-Aug-04, to lugnet.parts.mod, FTX)
 
  Re: Wow!
 
"John Barnes" <barnes@sensors.com> wrote in message news:I1wAnD.1HsF@lugnet.com... (...) I would imagine that you are going to fall more in the parts.custom and parts.mod category. Come on over, there's plenty of room!! Leave these purists to sit (...) (22 years ago, 4-Aug-04, to lugnet.parts)
 
  Re: Right on Schedule
 
(...) That'd be me. Lugnet member #377, owner of (URL) modder of the brick, curator of this particular newsgroup, and all around Dremel wielding weirdo. Keep up the great modding work, and post it here! Be sure you set your FUT's right though! -Rob (22 years ago, 4-Aug-04, to lugnet.parts.mod)
 
  Re: Do you mind if I modify the topic? (Larry Puns Again)
 
(...) It suddenly dawned on me that I couldn't recall that I had ever seen a lugnet.parts.mod forum so I ambled back here to see that it is in fact new. X-Acto® hobby knife? No. Dremel® rotary tool? No. Victorinox® Swiss Army™ Knife! I always have (...) (22 years ago, 4-Aug-04, to lugnet.parts.mod, FTX)  
 
  Re: Wow!
 
(...) Not here they'd better not be. You're thinking of parts.MOD.... :-) Questions suitable for here would be along the lines of "if LEGO could make just one new part next year, what would you choose?" (22 years ago, 4-Aug-04, to lugnet.parts)
 
  Wow!
 
They've made a special bat channel just for us! Hope the faint of heart purists don't browse these threads too often. There are all sorts of dastardly doings that are gonna get posted here. Mwuaahaaahaahaahaa (22 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.parts)
 
  Do you mind if I modify the topic? (was Re: Right on Schedule, ... or was it?
 
(...) Do you mind if I ask a question(1) about these fine mods rather than comment directly? I was wondering how you shaped these? Xacto® knife or equivalent? Dremel® cutoff tool or equivalent? Something else? Would you be willing to share that (...) (22 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.parts.mod, FTX)
 
  Re: Right on Schedule
 
(...) And proud of it, man. (...) What!?! Of course I'm bad for doing it. I am good at doing it however. (...) It had to do with axe grinding, and not specifically Lego, though Lego was in fact the medium. And how the FUT went entirely depended on (...) (22 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.parts.mod, FTX)
 
  Re: Right on Schedule
 
(...) Do you know that you are a bad bad person?(1) ++Lar 1 - You do know that you are bad, *not* for modifying, some of my best friends(2) modify stuff, but actually for not setting the FUT right? (3) 2 - Did you think to yourself "AND Rob (...) (22 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.parts.mod, FTX)
 
  (canceled)
 
 
  Re: STL File for 3D Printing
 
(...) Ah, oh well. Nice to e-meet you. (...) That's neat. I just spent a week at an RP conference, so the alphabet soup is still pretty fresh in my mind. I actually know what those acronyms stand for! (...) Oh, OK, you're doing it the "old fashioned (...) (22 years ago, 2-Aug-04, to lugnet.parts, lugnet.parts.custom, FTX)
 
  Re: STL File for 3D Printing
 
(...) Nope, that wasn't me. I'm a drafter (1). I haven't been to any brick cons yet, although I'm 95% sure I'll be at Brickfest in two weeks. But.. Hi yourself. (...) We have 2 FDM machines and 2 SLS ones. I'd have to go down there to get model (...) (22 years ago, 2-Aug-04, to lugnet.parts, lugnet.parts.custom, FTX)
 
  Re: wishin' on a star
 
(...) This thread has stuck in my mind for a while. First, a better link to the picture I meant to show in my original reply. (Bad form, I know... replying to my own post, but I'm fixing a poor FTX posting and adding new info... and using a new (...) (22 years ago, 2-Aug-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.build, lugnet.parts, FTX)
 
  Curator for lugnet.parts hierarchy
 
Rob Hendrix has graciously agreed to assume curatorship of the lugnet.parts hierarchy. Please give him all the support he deserves(1), thanks. ++Lar 1 - i.e. "none"(2) 2 - "That's a joke, son" (22 years ago, 1-Aug-04, to lugnet.parts, lugnet.admin.curators)
 
  Re: Are custom made parts LEGO?
 
(...) Hello Johannes, What follows are my opinions only... based on your questions. (...) I would respond, 'no' they're not. They would be construction parts compatible with the LEGO building system, but since they weren't actually made by LEGO, (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jul-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.parts.custom)
 
  Re: First post?
 
(...) Both styles have their advantages. In the two specific examples that you cited, the single-piece versions not only eliminate the seam you'd get when using the split parts side-by-side, but they're also hollow, allowing them to be secured by (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jul-04, to lugnet.parts, FTX)
 
  Re: First post?
 
(...) That's EXACTLY what I mean, and thank you very much for illustrating it since I was too lazy/rushed to dig up images. (...) I guess regular and inverse are almost as much a pair as right and left side but not QUITE as much, so I guess I can (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jul-04, to lugnet.parts, FTX)
 
  Re: Idea for new train wheel
 
(...) Agree with the high quality = no need for traction tires, but there is more to it than just weight. A high quality model has less need for traction tires beceause it designed to keep its wheels on the railhead better, either by springing or (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jul-04, to lugnet.parts.custom)

Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 16 more
Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR