Subject:
|
Re: GATS size
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.michlug
|
Date:
|
Thu, 17 May 2001 19:57:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
506 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.us.michlug, Steve Ringe writes:
> Here is a proposal for a 20x32 layout with a hollow center, the center area is
> 7.5x16. The open area on the end is 30" and would be a nice place to put a few
> bridges. Each rectangular area = 1 table.
>
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=45324
I believe we had some issues with depth of the layout at the January GATS.
It looks like you are suggesting 3 tables deep, and I am wondering if that
will give rise to some of the same issues or not. What do folks think?
It may be better to have a narrower layout with more space in the center for
a work area even if we don't use the whole space 100% (off by 2 feet in one
dimension or whatever...
Do we have an exact table dimension? 2.5' by 8' ??
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: GATS size
|
| (...) is (...) few (...) I think if we keep the train yard at 2 tables deep that will allow us easy acces to the switches, etc. I also think that we could use areas at 3 tables wide for the airport and town. Thats what I was thinking with that (...) (24 years ago, 17-May-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: GATS size
|
| (...) Here is a proposal for a 20x32 layout with a hollow center, the center area is 7.5x16. The open area on the end is 30" and would be a nice place to put a few bridges. Each rectangular area = 1 table. (URL) (24 years ago, 17-May-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
