Subject:
|
Re: GATS size
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.michlug
|
Date:
|
Thu, 17 May 2001 20:57:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
387 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.us.michlug, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.org.us.michlug, Steve Ringe writes:
>
> > Here is a proposal for a 20x32 layout with a hollow center, the center area • is
> > 7.5x16. The open area on the end is 30" and would be a nice place to put a • few
> > bridges. Each rectangular area = 1 table.
> >
> > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=45324
>
> I believe we had some issues with depth of the layout at the January GATS.
> It looks like you are suggesting 3 tables deep, and I am wondering if that
> will give rise to some of the same issues or not. What do folks think?
>
> It may be better to have a narrower layout with more space in the center for
> a work area even if we don't use the whole space 100% (off by 2 feet in one
> dimension or whatever...
>
> Do we have an exact table dimension? 2.5' by 8' ??
I think if we keep the train yard at 2 tables deep that will allow us easy
acces to the switches, etc. I also think that we could use areas at 3 tables
wide for the airport and town. Thats what I was thinking with that proposal.
Comments anyone?
>
> ++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: GATS size
|
| (...) Kinda what i was thinking.I wasn't sure until you just posted how big you train yard was and how many tables you would need.I think a mix if we can would work. (23 years ago, 17-May-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: GATS size
|
| (...) It looks like you are suggesting 3 tables deep, and I am wondering if that will give rise to some of the same issues or not. What do folks think? It may be better to have a narrower layout with more space in the center for a work area even if (...) (23 years ago, 17-May-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
