To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.us.michlugOpen lugnet.org.us.michlug in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / United States / MichLUG / 780
779  |  781
Subject: 
Re: GATS size
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.us.michlug
Date: 
Thu, 17 May 2001 21:01:03 GMT
Viewed: 
395 times
  
In lugnet.org.us.michlug, Steve Ringe writes:
In lugnet.org.us.michlug, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.org.us.michlug, Steve Ringe writes:

Here is a proposal for a 20x32 layout with a hollow center, the center area • is
7.5x16.  The open area on the end is 30" and would be a nice place to put a • few
bridges. Each rectangular area = 1 table.

http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=45324

I believe we had some issues with depth of the layout at the January GATS.
It looks like you are suggesting 3 tables deep, and I am wondering if that
will give rise to some of the same issues or not. What do folks think?

It may be better to have a narrower layout with more space in the center for
a work area even if we don't use the whole space 100% (off by 2 feet in one
dimension or whatever...

Do we have an exact table dimension? 2.5' by 8' ??

I think if we keep the train yard at 2 tables deep that will allow us easy
acces to the switches, etc.  I also think that we could use areas at 3 tables
wide for the airport and town.  Thats what I was thinking with that proposal.
Comments anyone?
Kinda what i was thinking.I wasn't sure until you just posted how big you
train yard was and how many tables you would need.I think a mix if we can
would work.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: GATS size
 
(...) 3 is just very wide. You can't hand people stuff like flyers across 3 tables, and you can't reach the interior, so anything that's 3 tables wide would need not to have track in the middle of it in case of a derailment... that's my opinion. (...) (23 years ago, 17-May-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: GATS size
 
(...) is (...) few (...) I think if we keep the train yard at 2 tables deep that will allow us easy acces to the switches, etc. I also think that we could use areas at 3 tables wide for the airport and town. Thats what I was thinking with that (...) (23 years ago, 17-May-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)

23 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR