 | | Re: plywood
|
|
(...) I think we will be a lot better off this time than in January because we'll have the plan WITH US (sorry Chris) and you guys have spent a lot of time fine-tuning it. On the other hand, our tear-down would be a lot quicker with a modular (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS
|
|
(...) Exolprers? I think I have some (that I can claim are) of those... (lessee, a timmy sitting on a 4x4 quad inverse with two 2x8 black plates for wings. Yes, I have 3 of those, no problem) (...) YOu have to fake a depression. That is, use a few (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Future plans Was(Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS)
|
|
Peter & All, Boy, I knew I should have waited before replying. I was too tired last night. I apologize for the last message here, it sounded really bad. I would like to see a plywood system that we can assemble before hand so we can transport it (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS
|
|
(...) We *can* do that, you know. Just takes time and money. GMLTC layout is modular and loads onto a custom trailer. Takes a bit more than 5 min to set up but not much more. Just time (a lot of it) and money (a lot of it). That's all we need. (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS
|
|
(...) Sorry I missed it. I have been working up the (small) space allotted to me to make a good looking display without regard to where the buildings came from. I think that's more important (to have it look cohesive and look like the buildings (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS
|
|
(...) I have made a missle like that if u need it (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS
|
|
Peter, (...) Well, it might be nice, but impractical. It just boils down to most people do not have that big of collection. Chris and Steve are making most of the display anyway, and the implications of trying to get that kind of things done before (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS
|
|
(...) I think the wharf could be done pretty well with the ramp and elevated train platform pieces. It would definitely be lower than your sub, though. In any case, spacewise I don't think we can consider it, from what I've seen of the layout. The (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS
|
|
(...) I *STILL* say we should do that... divide up the layout into different "neighborhoods," and each person is responsible for one or more neighborhoods. For the buildings, that it--lay the track down after. All we'd need is plywood with the (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
