Subject:
|
Re: Layout samples
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.lucny
|
Date:
|
Sat, 22 Jun 2002 21:17:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1504 times
|
| |
|
|
> Now, about this use of 4 tables with a gap--I like it. In fact, I would love
> it even more if table #5 were added to either the top right hand or top left
> hand corner. The outer train track can be routed through this new
> neighborhood. Result: more space for buildings -- like my airport with hotel
> if I ever build them; heavy industrial like oil refinery or gravel yard;
> residential; a lake; or Nate's western fort and civil war battle re-enactment.
> A little-used siding could also be here, but I am thinking along the lines of
> more actual space for structures.
>
> In fact, six tables could be used. But these are ideas better left for far off
> in the future, perhaps.
>
> __Kevin Salm__
Hey, Im working on a 30x60 module that could easily be added to the layout
(though no train attachment) for shows when Im out there and able. This is
along the same idea as what you were thinking, I believe. Its a simple
collection of some cool buildings (Ill post pics soon) and it could really
add to the layout when Im there. I also like the gaps in the tables. Eye
candy indeed.
-Dave
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Layout samples
|
| (...) of (...) Wayne, you forgot one major detail: due to the physical table layout, the bridge gap will have to be offset if we use 5 tables. Oh--it looks like you are using only 4 tables in this plan. Nate Jacobs mentioned a few posts back that he (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jun-02, to lugnet.org.us.lucny)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
