To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.us.indylugOpen lugnet.org.us.indylug in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / United States / IndyLUG / 720
719  |  721
Subject: 
Re: NMRA L gauge (was IndyLUG takes 1st place at GATS)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.us.indylug, lugnet.trains
Date: 
Tue, 21 Oct 2003 02:42:21 GMT
Viewed: 
1293 times
  
What kind of ruling are we waiting for? An acceptance into the Standards and
Recommended Practices, or a ruling that says L gage modelers can be legitimate
members of the NMRA?


They (NMRA) should NOT accept "L" gauge as it is, as at present it is a
propriatory system.  (Although, lego has not yet expressed a interest in
stopping us in the secondary market).  Does the NMRA have a listing for P4?
(not Proto:87)...it probably has less active modelers than Lego does...if it has
a listing for P4, then getting L gauge recognized should be easier.


A trivial question: why does the NMRA SRP spell "gauge" as "gage"?

Because either one is an acceptable spelling?  Kind of like waggon vice wagon.

gage is more common in industrial settings (that I can tell you, CGCM uses it
exclusively).

James Powell



Message is in Reply To:
  NMRA L gauge (was IndyLUG takes 1st place at GATS)
 
(...) Thanks! What kind of ruling are we waiting for? An acceptance into the Standards and Recommended Practices, or a ruling that says L gage modelers can be legitimate members of the NMRA? A trivial question: why does the NMRA SRP spell "gauge" (...) (21 years ago, 20-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.us.indylug, lugnet.trains)

14 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR