Subject:
|
Re: Standardizing Car Designs, etc.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Wed, 2 May 2001 13:45:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
478 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Iain Hendry writes:
> o o
> o+--+o
> | |
> | |
> o+--+o
> o o
>
> If you can do that, I'm very happy!
There isn't enough length on that platform for the cones on the end...the
end platforms are only 6 wide by 8 long, exactly the length of a container.
But you will have alignment marks on the side of the flatcar to optically
align yourself with.
Calum
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Standardizing Car Designs, etc.
|
| "Calum Tsang" <tsangc@mie.utoronto.ca> wrote in message news:GCpnKK.AMG@lugnet.com... (...) container. (...) Ew, are you still using those dual-height things? Crap... :-/ Really wish you'd just keep the level the same... Iain (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Standardizing Car Designs, etc.
|
| "Calum Tsang" <tsangc@mie.utoronto.ca> wrote in message news:GCovDK.4sv@lugnet.com... (...) Ideally, yes. And it'd be nice to have them on the ends, too. Right now, I can't really locate lengthwise along the train. +--+ | | | | +--+ is a container (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
