To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 823
822  |  824
Subject: 
Re: Standardizing Car Designs, etc.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Wed, 2 May 2001 01:25:29 GMT
Viewed: 
980 times
  
I'll have one RCX (coincidently I only have one) for the turntable.

Jeff VW

In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Jeff Elliott writes:
> Hey folks, (esp. Iain...)
> 
> So, we're talking about doing some nifty automated stuff at Train1.
> Cool.  I think we're going to need to talk about some common
> standards if we want to be able to interoperate, though:
> 
> 1) Freight boxes:  Okay, we talked about this: 4x8x4 bricks, the
> standard Lego freight container.  Don't assume that there are sides
> to it, though!
> 
> 2) Freight cars:  I saw Calum's prototype, and it seems to me that
> a robot is going to have trouble landing boxes precisely enough for
> that car - the positions of the crates are fine, but we might have
> to work on lowering the sides and making more error-firendly cars.
> 
> 
> 3) Gravel/Whatever hopper cars:  Side tip or bottom-unloading?  I
> don't care; I just put stuff in the cars.  Someone care to step up
> to the task of designing a standard hopper car?
> 
> 
> 4) Car coding:  Do we want to put labels/plates on the sides of the
> interactive car types so that our automation can discern an engine
> from, say, a freight car or hopper?  Wouldn't require too much work,
> but I want to know if it's been done before.  Mean time to failure
> is important here - it'd be nice to have a dependable solution that
> would only fail once in a hundred cars or less, and adapt to light
> conditions, etc.
> 
> 
> 5) RCX commo protocols:  I'm bringing RCXes to the show, and they're
> going to be talking to one another a lot.  I can do one of three
> things:  Put them all in a cave or a box so that they can
> intercommunicate without interference; I can use a robust multi-
> message transport layer (and mess up anyone else...)  or those of us
> who are bringing multiple RCXes can chose messages which don't
> interfere.  So who is bringing RCXes?
> 
> 
> Jeff E



Message is in Reply To:
  Standardizing Car Designs, etc.
 
Hey folks, (esp. Iain...) So, we're talking about doing some nifty automated stuff at Train1. Cool. I think we're going to need to talk about some common standards if we want to be able to interoperate, though: 1) Freight boxes: Okay, we talked (...) (25 years ago, 1-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

9 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR