Subject:
|
Re: Train 4: Coming Soon
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 Jan 2003 19:57:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2220 times
|
| |
|
|
You know, I completely bafflegabbed that message. The joint between
Ramp 1 and 2 is exactly *6* bricks. However, that does indeed mean that
the joint between the 2nd and 3rd curve segment on that turn is 4
bricks, so we're good. Me not talk so good. Ugh.
Jeff E
David Koudys wrote:
>
> In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Jeff Elliott writes:
> > Looks great, Dave!
> >
> > Sorry I didn't get back to you earlier about track heights.
> >
> > The joint between Ramp2 and Ramp 1 is exactly 4 bricks elevation.
> > "Standard" track height on the layout is 1 plate (to allow curves,
> > switches, etc). I adhere to the maxslope = .2 brick per segment, max
> > change = .1 per segment^2
> >
> > I don't incline switches, that's asking for it.
> >
> > I'm sure your join is within a plate either way, so we'll make do.
> >
> > Jeff E
>
>
> <snip>
>
> We're good then 'cause at the end of my second curve I'm at exactly 4 bricks
> high :)
>
> Then I hand off to you...
>
> I have eliminated all landscaping *sigh*, and am in the process of filling
> the module with misc buildings and forestry.
>
> Wimping out I know, but, eh, I know when to throw in the towel ;)
>
> (of course, I'm also a really cool frood who knows where his towel is, so
> there you are.)
>
> Dave K
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Train 4: Coming Soon
|
| (...) <snip> We're good then 'cause at the end of my second curve I'm at exactly 4 bricks high :) Then I hand off to you... I have eliminated all landscaping *sigh*, and am in the process of filling the module with misc buildings and forestry. (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jan-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
