Subject:
|
Re: What's in a name...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Fri, 13 Dec 2002 16:50:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
497 times
|
| |
|
|
> I've always liked the three step approach:
> MATT...
> MATTHEW...
> MATTHEW THOMAS...
hummm
I like that.. it has a certain appeal.
let me try it with one of my other rejected alternates
BUTROS....
BUTROS BUTROS...
BUTROS BUTROS GALI............
Hey that works... I'll mention this to Kate. she has about 3 weeks
left. the doctor said she should finish work NOW, and her hands and
fingers are staring to swell.
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: What's in a name...
|
| (...) I've always liked the three step approach: MATT... MATTHEW... MATTHEW THOMAS... (...) hmm. yes. sorry about that. typo. this time. :) Actually, I usually don't have a problem with people mispelling my last name. They ALWAYS ask. Steve (22 years ago, 13-Dec-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
