Subject:
|
Re: Train width clearance for wide turns, etc.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 13:54:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1381 times
|
| |
|
|
Calum Tsang wrote:
> Speaking of that, I'm having a lot of trouble with making things 14-15 brick
> tall compliant. This requirement really stretches the vertical axis of
> buildings far too high, making over track structures rather unusual looking.
>
> Calum
My trains do pretty much make use of the full 15 brick clearence. But I
really only request that there be one line that I can run on. I think
the outside loop makes the most sense. If people want to deside to make
the inner loops 6 wide only and lower the clearence I'm ok with that.
I'd just like one line that I run my trains around.
Also, wasn't the main reason for this requirement so the camera car
would fit. I know I didn't make up the 15 bricks, I just made full use
of it. :-)
Derek
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Train width clearance for wide turns, etc.
|
| (...) I just measured the new caboose, and I think we'd need 13.1 for it. It's the tallest car I have; other folks will have to weigh in with their models. Hey! - that's right, I've got a virtual Club Car - and it looks like it needs 11.2. I agree (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jul-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Train width clearance for wide turns, etc.
|
| (...) If the top town is called Altenburg, what is the bottom villages called? (...) Speaking of that, I'm having a lot of trouble with making things 14-15 brick tall compliant. This requirement really stretches the vertical axis of buildings far (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jul-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
