Subject:
|
Re: Philosophical town question.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Fri, 9 Mar 2001 01:48:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
513 times
|
| |
|
|
> Yet if you don't, it feels like the Decorated Shed approach to architecture.
> I'm stuck there too-I have some buildings without backs, and others with backs.
>
> Calum
Hey, Calum....
I like the "woodshed" approach myself....(without the back walls) for the
reason it was designed there by Lego...it allows for increased play and
easier access...
While I feel a little awkward now about playing with a town layout, looking
at it doesn't bring the full effect of emotions as "getting involved" with
the layout and imagining the real-life action going on.
I guess your approach works for you because it is your set-up...I am in
the army right at the moment, and a concept that is constantly being
drilled into my mind...dress-right-dress: everything has to be uniform.
I really don't want to apply this principle into my town, except with the
approach to the back-walls. (but that is entirely my opinion and my view!)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Philosophical town question.
|
| (...) I'm of the impression things need to be furnished, but it's really a question of time and pieces-I have some buildings without furnishings, and others completely furnished. I also have one building missing floors :) But as Ben mentioned, it (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
