|
Since I don't know if I'm bringing a participating robot ... (most likely not)
I won't cast my vote...but I'll add my input anyways.
I already said it would make a very interesting battle if there was only
one flag, and two robots fighting for it.
The 3 tables make it interesting for programming.
So if I WERE "voting", I'd chose 3 tables and 1 flag. But all it is right
now is opinion. As a unofficiall rtlToronto official, I think my opinion
should have at least a small amount of "weight". :)
Just my $.02.
Benjamin Medinets
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Calum Tsang writes:
> I want to hear a votes on:
>
> a) three tables, one flag
>
> Pros: Less possibility of robots running over the other person's flag
> before attempting to span bridge. Increased aggresion between robots on
> center island.
>
> Cons: Have to contend with second robot in competition for the flag.
>
> b) two tables, two flags
>
> Pros: Simpler game with one goal for each person.
>
> Cons: Scoring complications (due to figuring out scores for people who have
> their flags knocked out by other robot before they get a chance to lift them)
>
> Let's finalize. Present your arguments for either, but I want a vote from
> each rtlToronto member (where member is defined by someone within the
> Windsor/Ottawa corridor that will be actually bringing a robot to said event)
>
> Calum
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | rtl11 Decision
|
| I want to hear a votes on: a) three tables, one flag Pros: Less possibility of robots running over the other person's flag before attempting to span bridge. Increased aggresion between robots on center island. Cons: Have to contend with second robot (...) (23 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|