| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Bruce Sheridan writes:
> I think the pictures on the rtlToronto site are great and I plan to build
> the ladder exactly as depicted (16 rungs, every 6 inches, starting 3 inches
> in from one end of the 2x4). I suggest the height of the legs be approx 24
> inches.
You might wish to have that entire assembly with legs put onto a table or
two. This would make it easier to place and start robots, to catch them if
they fall, plus would give everyone around a better view.
> Padding???…Are you a train guy?
Oh, it never stops :)
Calum
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: monkey rungs
|
| My 2c on various things in this thread: Regarding rules changes: Rob, it's fine with me if we allow non-RCX solutions. Changing the rules to allow for solutions we hadn't considered seems reasonable. One temptation you have to avoid, though, is (...) (23 years ago, 28-Aug-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: monkey rungs
|
| (...) I think the pictures on the rtlToronto site are great and I plan to build the ladder exactly as depicted (16 rungs, every 6 inches, starting 3 inches in from one end of the 2x4). I suggest the height of the legs be approx 24 inches. (...) (23 years ago, 28-Aug-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
