| |
In lugnet.org.ca.obb, David Koudys wrote:
> In lugnet.org.ca.obb, Rob Antonishen wrote:
> > Being a visual kind of guy I just wanted to confirm the following
> > layout for tug-of-war (not that I'm promising anything but I am
> > considering attending....)
> >
> > http://www.majhost.com/gallery/ffaat/Stuff/rect5320.png
> >
> > And these boards/tables are 2" off the ground?
> >
> > -Rob A.
>
> And if we can get a clarification on the rules that if *any* part or piece of
> the robot falls below the top plane of the board, it automatically loses
>
> This will prevent the 'hook' grab onto the back and/or sides of the wood. IMHO,
> the hook grab (even though i did it last time) defeats the true purpose of tug
> o' war...
>
> And as for the other thing, I think I can build a 'bot out of pure lego and
> sensors that can find and blow out a candle. however, for those that can't
> muster the 'bot building stuff o' legend to do that... well, sure we could allow
> 3rd party stuff...
>
> Dave K
> -smack talk mode 'on'
Oh Dave,
I know you may be good at building a BIG, and heavy bots, but when it comes to
finesse, your skills leave something to be desired.
Look.
I see it thus:
If you(someone) can build a bot, that fits within the starting size and can
either drive, or launch a hook to the end of the 2" high game area and NOT touch
the ground, then you can use a hook and I think that should be allowed.
I like the hook I idea.
But I would be open to debate.
Chris
B.E.D
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
13 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
