Subject:
|
Re: t3d Postpone and Dave's Battlebots Smackdown
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Mon, 23 Oct 2006 19:27:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1091 times
|
| |
|
|
At 11:58 AM 10/23/06, you wrote:
> In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
> > At 12:02 AM 10/21/06, you wrote:
> >
> > > So....at dinner we figured we had to postponed t3d (Tic Tac Toe
> > > Drawn) into next
> > > year....and to bring up another contest earlier.
> > >
> > > One of the ideas floated (okay, the only idea floated) was • Dave's Battlebots.
> > > However, the question arose, should this be a RC controlled game
> > > (similar to the
> > > live2 event we did a few years ago) or should it be autonomous?
> >
> > What sort of time frame did you have in mind?
> >
> > I haven't visited Canada in a couple years...
>
> We were thinking first week of January.
As in Jan 6? Hmm...
I'd love to see some good LEGO destruction. Unfortunately, I don't
think autonomous battlebots will be very satisfying.
On the other hand, with the NXT, it's possible to create a
remote-control system, where the controls won't interfere with each
other. (if someone wanted to use their NXT for a battlebot)
Here's what I'd say:
12x12 inches
5lbs
Remote Control
On the 8ft x 8ft table
It looses if:
It leaves the arena (by going over the 6 inch walls)
Or it can't move on it's own for 10 seconds (this does not include
being pinned)
As much as I'd like to suggest "Our club" vs "Your club", I think we
should keep in mind the actual spirit of the event, which is more in
line with "carnage at all cost", or "you buy it, I break it".
I'm going to have to create a robot that can explode on impact...
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
10 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
