rtlToronto : 16371


Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 16371	16370 \| 16372

Subject:	Re: BASIC for the NXT was Re: R21 - Robot Status
Newsgroups:	lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date:	Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:33:10 GMT
Viewed:	890 times

In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Dave Astolfo wrote: > for me. However, for the RCX and NXT, I am most comfortable with NQC (C#)... > strange... This might be expained by me being ambidextrous. Some things left, > some things right... Dave, NQC is not at all like C#. Neither is RobotC. Are you sure that is what you mean? John Hansen

Message has 2 Replies:

		Re: BASIC for the NXT was Re: R21 - Robot Status
(...) Here's what I want: a) An environment that works like BricXCC that allows for edit, debug and compile from a graphical front end. b) A language which looks like C and supports proper function/variable passing (UNLIKE NQC). Not C#, not BASIC, (...) (18 years ago, 11-Jul-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

		Re: BASIC for the NXT was Re: R21 - Robot Status
(...) Sorry. C# was a bad example. Let me us the term "somethink like C". Dave (18 years ago, 11-Jul-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: BASIC for the NXT was Re: R21 - Robot Status
(...) Chris, Fair enough. I thought you were a NQC fan/user, that is why I mentioned it. I too would welcome something VB/VBscript-like based as well. Oddly, I have done some PDA app development and would only use VB to do it as it comes naturtally (...) (18 years ago, 11-Jul-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

17 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search