 | | Y??? 'Cause I'm asking!!!
|
|
So a few questions for rtl20 I think Derek asked this one--the 4 stud width beside the opening--does ths mean it can be 4 studs until the next opening, or does each opening require it's own 4 stud walls with no overlap? Fine ASCII Graphix below-- (...) (18 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Y??? 'Cause I'm asking!!!
|
|
This is the answer I got: (...) Yes (...) No (...) Pick a colour for your walls that you have matching hinge bricks for, or reconfigure so the hinge is one stud behind the wall. Then it doesn't mater what colour the hinge is. Derek (18 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Y??? 'Cause I'm asking!!!
|
|
(...) mmmm I'd disagree. I think shared walls should be allowable (as I can't think of a good reason why not :) I'd say the XXXXOOOOOOOOXXXXOOOOOOOOXXXX is allowed so long as it is all on one plane. This (two openings) is the maximum that can fit on (...) (18 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Y??? 'Cause I'm asking!!!
|
|
(...) > (...) Ok but this was discussed months ago and it was decided that this would not be allowed. I don't think this issue should be reopened at this stage. (...) The defined transfer "buffer" needs to be one colour, the rest can be what ever (...) (18 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Y??? 'Cause I'm asking!!!
|
|
(...) I'm OK with that. I just know it never made it into the "official" transfer set description, or the "guidelines", so I didn't know it had been agreed to. -Rob A> (18 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Y??? 'Cause I'm asking!!!
|
|
(...) K, no worries there (...) Not to pull a Hassenplug(tm), but this is what the rules state-- 2.1 Transfer Interface ... The Wall Surface should be a uniform colour and made of solid bricks. 4.0 Design Guidelines ... The Wall Surface should be (...) (18 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Y??? 'Cause I'm asking!!!
|
|
(...) This is a rule. (...) This is not. (...) I believe the intent is 'should' means 'must' otherwise the rule is meaningless and could be completely ignored. When writing design documents I am very careful not to use the word should. It renders (...) (18 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Y??? 'Cause I'm asking!!!
|
|
(...) I put in a fair amount of effort differentiating out should versus must. Any should is really a recommendation. Chris was super anal about how he didn't want to enforce certain items on people. Uniform colour and solid bricks was one of them. (...) (18 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Y??? 'Cause I'm asking!!!
|
|
(...) I thought that's why we included a guidelines sections. So we could differentiate between what is required and what isn't. This approach is more confusing, not less. Derek (18 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Y??? 'Cause I'm asking!!!
|
|
(...) After reviewing the offical draft rules page, this MIGHT cover it, but could be open to interpatation. --snip--- The width of the outside dimension can be as wide as you want, except that it must always preserve the 4 dot margin on each side. (...) (18 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
