Subject:
|
Re: Y??? 'Cause I'm asking!!!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:19:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
709 times
|
| |
|
|
On 1/13/06, Derek Raycraft wrote:
> Rob Antonishen wrote:
> > I'd disagree. I think shared walls should be allowable (as I can't
> > think of a good reason why not :)
> >
> > I'd say the XXXXOOOOOOOOXXXXOOOOOOOOXXXX is allowed so long as it is
> > all on one plane. This (two openings) is the maximum that can fit on
> > one straight wall les than 12" long.
> >
> > Other thoughts on this?
>
> Ok but this was discussed months ago and it was decided that this would
> not be allowed. I don't think this issue should be reopened at this stage.
I'm OK with that. I just know it never made it into the "official"
transfer set description, or the "guidelines", so I didn't know it had
been agreed to.
-Rob A>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Y??? 'Cause I'm asking!!!
|
| (...) After reviewing the offical draft rules page, this MIGHT cover it, but could be open to interpatation. --snip--- The width of the outside dimension can be as wide as you want, except that it must always preserve the 4 dot margin on each side. (...) (18 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Y??? 'Cause I'm asking!!!
|
| (...) > (...) Ok but this was discussed months ago and it was decided that this would not be allowed. I don't think this issue should be reopened at this stage. (...) The defined transfer "buffer" needs to be one colour, the rest can be what ever (...) (18 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
