 | | Re: Honda Element Commercial Link
|
|
(...) Ya, they are definitely not Lego branded bricks, but instead some generic building brick. Although most people will identify them as being Lego. (...) That's the best part. And as I keep telling people, it's not a car it's an IPOD accessory. (...) (21 years ago, 16-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Honda Element Commercial Link
|
|
(...) Echo.... watch what you say Calum.... 4-door, yes, ugly.... 3 and 5 door hatchbacks (Yaris)....very cute Skylark.... you mean the version with the "tumor" up front? yup! Pontiac Aztek.... 'nuff said..... no argument there Ralph!!! <snip> (...) (...) (21 years ago, 16-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Honda Element Commercial Link
|
|
(...) Those look like Mega Blocks. (...) Sure is, it can easily challenge Pontiac Aztec for the Ugliest Car of the Century Award Ivan - I will not lie in front of the school bus with ketchup on my face (21 years ago, 16-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Honda Element Commercial Link
|
|
(...) Or the Toyota Echo. Or the Buick Skylark.* The Element has an unusual look. I wouldn't call it ugly--more deliberately utilitarian. It bears a resemblence to cars like the Mercedes Benz G-class (IIRC is the foundation of the Popemobile and (...) (21 years ago, 16-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | RE: Honda Element Commercial Link
|
|
(...) Yes, but ass ugly on purpose, as opposed to the Pontiac Spazztech... Ralph (21 years ago, 16-Oct-03, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: C4: *yawn*
|
|
(...) In fact, that's all the programming ANY of your robots have ever had! (21 years ago, 16-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: C4: *yawn*
|
|
I hate to agree with Chris, but, we’ve all said since minute one, that this contest was going to be long and boring. And Rob, you were the guy pushing for a programming contest. Well congratulations, you’ve got it. The concept of reducing the time (...) (21 years ago, 16-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: C4: *yawn*
|
|
(...) I still think the best way to make the game more exciting is to drop the time limit to more like 5 mins per bot. That way it severely limits the amount of calculation possible (like 15 secs per move) and forces people to make very quick (...) (21 years ago, 16-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: C4: *yawn*
|
|
OK freak boy! listen up!!! one of the deciding factors of this game was because of ~YOU~!!!! you went on at the last game about how you wanted to see more of a programming challenge. so we came up with this!!! I don't deny that this will be a very (...) (21 years ago, 16-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | C4: *yawn*
|
|
Just a thought, but does anyone else get the feeling this event is going to be incredibly boring to watch? Not only are the matches between robots going to be dreadfully slow, but there will be very little to see. Think about it: with all of the (...) (21 years ago, 15-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
