 | | Re: testing in rtl...
|
|
(...) Does it? From the sounds of things it seemed like people who read posts via NNTP or SMTP were just seeing the raw FTX codes rather than the real text-- is that only in some readers? IE is there something out there that recognizes that [foobar] (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: testing in rtl...
|
|
(...) Take 2... I like it Todd, don't change a thing... I notice that web-links in indented messages (from posting replies) aren't actually underlining... but I'm sure someone mentioned that elsewhere... Take care and keep up the great work. The (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: testing in rtl...
|
|
(...) It's a Content-Type header. The content type is set to 'x-ftx'...although this is causing some trouble for people so it'll probably change to 'text/plain' and a different header would be used. (...) If your newsreader or e-mail editor allows (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: testing in rtl...
|
|
(...) well, I think it is because FTX is a resident "interpretive program" for LUGNET. The cool and easy effects happen only if you are using the web interface. Ben (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: testing in rtl...
|
|
(...) Not any more it isn't. :-) (...) I'm using email to post these messages. So far I haven't found anything that explains how you turn FTX on for email. Derek (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: testing in rtl...
|
|
(...) It seems like there's a "is this FTX?" bit set for each message. Hence, every message is either flagged as plain text or as FTX. Since yours (I assume) comes in via SMTP, I think it must get automatically set to be plain text rather than FTX. (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: testing in rtl...
|
|
(...) Hmm, I guess not!! :-) Except of cource if I reply to it with the web interface. Derek (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: testing in rtl...
|
|
(...) from the web-interface, it looks very cool. Nice Job. Ben (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: testing in rtl...
|
|
(...) This is [bold]. <lets you link to a web site> <<lets you show the viewers (using the web browser to see the picture right away)>> see the FTX guide... (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: testing in rtl...
|
|
(...) As a person that reads the rtl group through email, I can see the FTX stuff getting very annoying. :-) All I get to see is the codes. And it's wrapping the urls enough that the mail client doesn't interpret the links. So how does this FTX (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | testing in rtl...
|
|
Just thought i'd test my new .sig file in rtlToronto, just 'cause I like annoying those closest to me... (2 URLs) Sparky's Space--Where Sparky has his Space... (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: DCC for the RCX
|
|
sorry Rookie mistake... I needed to change it to FTX (duh...me so stupide!!) (...) Trains and Robotics can finally reach a common goal... :) (...) In Other News, (...) (URL) (...) (URL) (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: DCC for the RCX
|
|
(...) Trains and Robotics can finally reach a common goal... :) ---...--- So I guess those RCX's (especially the RCX 1.0's) do come in handy after all. Actually, it looks very neat. This is something that we should be directing... now all I need is (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Hello, Hello, H e l l o, H e l l o, ...
|
|
(...) HI! (...) (21 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Hello, Hello, H e l l o, H e l l o, ...
|
|
This message is actually comment on how quiet it is, and not just a test to see if I can post. :-) Derek (21 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Should I upgrade to RIS 2.0?
|
|
(...) correct. (...) clearly you just need to be told what to do. so, lets try again. 1. get the latest SDK from lego (see other posts) 2. instal it in the brick. 3. use the original lego windows GUI for your son to program bots, 4. YOU use NQC to (...) (21 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Hilarity ensues
|
|
(URL) sorry, but this is the most hilarious thing I have EVER SEEN. BTW, I saw a thing about a robotics event in Kitchener-Waterloo! Kids were using Mindstorms to explore the exciting world of robotics. Excellent! I think they were at RIM Park. Iain (21 years ago, 26-May-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: John Goodman on WW
|
|
(...) Oh come on, you two. ANY fast train is, by definition, beautiful, at least in my book. I'll grant you that some are more beautiful than others but there are **NO** ugly 200 kph+ trains. :-) (21 years ago, 24-May-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: John Goodman on WW
|
|
"Tim Courtney" <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:HFDEq5.nEI@lugnet.com... (...) is. (...) (URL) 6, I did my project on Linear Electric Motors. I built a synchronous linear motor (SLM) and test track/car out of LEGO. I won second place in (...) (21 years ago, 24-May-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: John Goodman on WW
|
|
(...) Blah. (...) :-) space. I'm watching the videos on this page right now: (URL) very cool stuff. I did my 8th grade science project on maglev trains ... wow that was a long time ago. -Tim (21 years ago, 24-May-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
