 | | Re: rtlToronto 11
|
|
"Rob Stehlik" <Robbby31@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Gv3AG9.KxJ@lugnet.com... (...) (200 mm robot. 600 mm gap.) (...) it I got the impression Phil had taken over running it...? Iain (23 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: I think I love it!
|
|
"Rob Stehlik" <Robbby31@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Gv39HD.HLw@lugnet.com... (...) Oh, I understand absolutely nothing about the mathematics. My mom tried to get me to at least look at what she'd done for my taxes last night, and I got mad (...) (23 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto 11
|
|
(...) Make it 300 mm, and you've got an even sweeter deal. ;) Iain (I'm serious) (23 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Will be in Toronto April23-May7
|
|
(...) Sexy would be SAL 9000. "Good afternoon, Dr Chandra. Do you have anything for me?" (...) Hey! What's wrong with XP? Iain (who likes XP, but desires OS X and a beautiful TiPowerBook...) (23 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.loc.ca.on, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto 11
|
|
(...) I have. after 2 hours of messin' around, the easiest soloution for me, (and to keep it in ONE RCX) was to creat a A/C robot, and have it push a premade bridge to the gap. even then it was still intersting, and I had not even gotten to the part (...) (23 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto 11
|
|
(...) I haven't built a prototype for this, but from trying to build a soccer robot, an 8 inch cube robot is probably too small. In an 8 inch cube the RCX takes up a large portion of the space. I think we should stick with our usual 12 inch cube. I (...) (23 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto 11
|
|
Since we're all putting in our 2 cents about the dimensions, here goes: 12 inch robot, 20 or 24 inch gap Has anybody actually tried to build a robot yet??? This theoretical debate is interesting and all, but until someone actually tries to build (...) (23 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto 11
|
|
8 inch robot. 24 inch gap. Maybe thats exaggerating, but it would certainly be more interesting to watch. I don't want to see prefab 12 inch bridges as Chris suggested. That would be dead boring. At least make the gap bigger than the robot so some (...) (23 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: I think I love it!
|
|
Stunning. The report wasn't completely over my head, but mostly. I liked the explanation and background information. It makes sense that parallel mechanisms offer higher speed and flexibility in machining, but their downside is the funky work (...) (23 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtlToronto 11
|
|
(...) <beaucoup de snippage> (...) mmmm.... that sounds great. One further stipulation about the size/gap... the 'bot must fit inside the gap. No overhang or nothing....just to make the contest interesting. Ben (23 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
