 | | Re: r10 Project X -- Rules final
|
|
"Bruce Sheridan" <bruce.sheridan@cogeco.ca> wrote in message news:GqvxIE.1qx@lugnet.com... (...) Programming in assembler is amazing, I find it so remarkable that you're doing it this way! I think it's just... amazing. I wish I had your patience! I (...) (23 years ago, 2-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: r10 Project X -- Rules final
|
|
(...) are they ever????? -- Chris Pretend this says something funny (23 years ago, 2-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: r10 Project X -- Rules final
|
|
(...) I need to follow my own advice and get working. So far I've built a few versions which have not proven to be satisfactory. As for code, the script is easy but lego assembler has crappy documentation (can I say that?...oh well, you only live (...) (23 years ago, 2-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: r10 Project X -- Rules final
|
|
"Bruce Sheridan" <bruce.sheridan@cogeco.ca> wrote in message news:Gqvw27.KpK@lugnet.com... (...) *JUST FELL OFF CHAIR* (...) Bruce Sheridan = Chubs a Rier End :) (...) Thanks, Bruce :) (see, this is the kind of brothership you can't get with train.) (...) (23 years ago, 2-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: r10 Project X -- Rules final
|
|
(...) I figured you might say something like that...My list of people that I must seriously devastate Chris Dave Iain And I don’t want any wimpy excuses like: I couldn’t find a serial port – Dave I thought we were measuring in hours, not seconds – (...) (23 years ago, 2-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: r10 Project X -- Rules final
|
|
"Bruce Sheridan" <bruce.sheridan@cogeco.ca> wrote in message news:GqvuvF.HHr@lugnet.com... (...) You don't need my blessin' for NUTTIN. Nuttin Nuttin Nuttin. I'm just encouraging the *use* of names for once, instead of "Bob's Robot," "Frank's (...) (23 years ago, 2-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: r10 Project X -- Rules final
|
|
(...) Well Iain, since I understand that we need your blessing on robot names, I was thinking of x'82'...what do you think? Bruce (23 years ago, 2-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Module/rtl10
|
|
"Chris Magno" <cmagno@rogers.com> wrote in message news:3C5B2048.70BE2B...ers.com... (...) And I get in poo for posting a simple anagram! Hysterical. (...) Of course! I only suggested it because I just SORT OF want my robot to sit still. I never (...) (23 years ago, 2-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: r10 Project X -- Rules final
|
|
Well, After a lot of soul searching, I have decided that A decision has to be made as to scoring so that we can all build our robots and tune as required.... and the winner is..... This game is both about speed AND accuracy. By the very nature of (...) (23 years ago, 2-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Module/rtl10
|
|
ummm, about screwing...... (a-hem) (...) the topic of screwing ones robot down, has come up. and I was wondering..... my robot right now, as it sits on the work table, actually has bits of it lift itself off the table when it runs the anti-x. Now, (...) (23 years ago, 1-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
