| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) It's not because I don't want to post. It's a little conspicuous having a lugnet window open at work. An email client on the other hand makes it look like you're doing work. :-) Plus I can spell check my messages. (...) Actually, I don't care (...) (19 years ago, 5-Apr-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) You should all start posting. Otherwise, people will think we're reponsible for the demise of Lugnet... :) (...) Well, for that matter, why should the rope go in a straight line on the horizontal plane? By the same reasoning, you could do (...) (19 years ago, 5-Apr-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) Ya I do a lot of lurking these days, now that I can't post through email. (...) snip stuff (...) I agree with removing the 2" string height limit too. I thought it was strange because at dinner we were talking about all the different (...) (19 years ago, 5-Apr-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) temporarily delurking... I like the tug-of-war idea.... 1.5lbs sounds like a good compromise. And I like the battery box possibilities of this contest.... I do have a comment regarding the now defunct 2" string height limit though. Depending (...) (19 years ago, 5-Apr-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) I won't be linking it until we're reasonably frozen on it: (URL) tend to hide them with a URL only on Lugnet's rtlToronto NG until we're reasonably solid it won't change. This is to make things a little easier on those who may not keep up with (...) (19 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote: <snip> (...) but i don't want to be a pirate!!! i mean, don't want to reply to your e-mail 'cause i've been soooo busy tat i haven't had time to look at it yet. maybe I'll take a look tonite and see (...) (19 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) YOUR ALIVE!!!!! YAY!!! Daves ALIVE!!! yay!!! now if only he would reply to my email. Chris (19 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) MR. you got your self a DEAL... (tunrs and mutters under breath... heh heh heh.. suckkkeeeerrrrrrr) Chris (19 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) And a link is where....? Didn't see it on the main page. Dave K (19 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) How about I give you an updated rules page? I removed the 2" height entry and exit (I wanted people to not have a height advantage to begin the round with, but whatever...) and added in the 1.5 pound weight limit. Calum (19 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | fighting robots
|
|
If dave ever comes back from being MIA, I think he would like this: these are a few robots I made out of 100% LEGO and a microscout. (URL) excuse my talking in the video, I was with a few of my fello lego robot builders. ;) Chris (19 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: Lego my Eggo
|
|
(...) (URL) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Lego my Eggo
|
|
Anyone see this yet? (URL) A> (19 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) ok 1.5 lb BUT you have to give me a reciept for the FULL price Chris (19 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) I think 1.5 isn't a bad comprimise on one and two pounds. I think one is a little extreme and two may be too "fat". 1.5 may just be enough to keep people on edge. Calum (19 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) Right, I know all that..... thats why i want to suggest the LIGHTER weight. To artificially force a constraint to work around. Anyone can make a heavy bot for tug of war. Can you make a LIGHT one?? Chris (19 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) Well I just weighed my last bot for Project Y without the transfer openings, and it came in at 2.5 lbs. I'd be leaning toward 1.5+ myself. Just throw an existing build on a kitchen scale and see what it weighs... -Rob A> (19 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) 1.5? Bricks are heavy. Calum (19 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: A Battery Leaked in my Micro Scout!
|
|
(...) forgot the image link to the milk bag: (URL) (19 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: A Battery Leaked in my Micro Scout!
|
|
(...) OMG!!! Derek.. ok. first thing.. STAY CAL(u)M not DOT COM, but CALM next. get the thickest, rubbery-est gloves you can find; and don them. NOW,you need to understand that batteries leak the wort TOXIC acid, known to man. You should ALSO be (...) (19 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|