 | | Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam?
|
|
(...) But if you subscribe via email, the from is unmangled. So a smammer would just have to subscribe for a while and collect all the "from" addressed (the reply-to is set to the mailing list, however) and bingo - has a nice big list of valid (...) (21 years ago, 17-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Oh No!! The zombies!!!
|
|
First there was the zombie demo... (URL) there was the advanced demo, where people could shoot back (and drop the occasional nuke...) (URL) Zombie 3--where you just drop nukes to kill the 'undead' (URL) now my favourite zombie game-- Zombie 4, (...) (21 years ago, 17-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Gluing Lego
|
|
MEK is about all that will work well. The parks use a combo of MEK and liquid ABS resin, but MEK will work well enough. You can get pint cans of it at various hardware stores, I'm pretty sure HD/Lowe's would have it in the paint dept. If not, try (...) (21 years ago, 16-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam?
|
|
(...) The address shown for me is : <lar(at@at)miltontra...t.dot)com> (that is, it's been mangled, if you "view raw message" for THIS post you'll see what I mean) Todd put in a way for you to force-mangle your addresses. Not perfect since the coding (...) (21 years ago, 16-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam?
|
|
(...) There's the same problem here on Lugnet: if you're reading this from the Lugnet web site, just look over the "reply" icon, there's a "View raw message" link. Try it... Before I shut down this address, I received a lot of spam: mechanical (...) (21 years ago, 16-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam?
|
|
(...) Thanks Larry, I wanted to understand method by which my email address was harvested before address it to MOCPages. Clearly it's a design flaw, and not something more sinister which was one of my original concerns. Derek (21 years ago, 16-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - anyone own a robot vacum?
|
|
(...) I wouldn't take that statement too seriously -- it's a lawyer spouting turf-talk, not a product review. Steve (21 years ago, 16-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam?
|
|
(...) It would take a little more development effort to do a hash, but ya. Ouch. I agree. Ouch. Not only that but it seems to vary across time, some of my creations have older email addresses embedded, presumably matching when I changed my emails as (...) (21 years ago, 16-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam?
|
|
(...) Now there's a serious design flaw. In fact the use of your email address in this way appears to be contrary to the MOCPages privacy policy. " We hate unsolicited e-mail just as much as everyone else. We will never distribute, sell, or abuse (...) (21 years ago, 16-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Has MOCPages been harvested for spam?
|
|
(...) Unfortunately all the thumbnail images contain you address in the URL (right click and select view image and look at the name of the file). I assume this is where they've been harvested from. Tim (21 years ago, 16-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
