Subject:
|
Re: Can we have a Newsgroup for KIDLUG?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org
|
Date:
|
Thu, 24 Feb 2000 14:07:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3543 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.org, Aaron Bergman writes:
> > > I must admit I'm still confused. I don't understand where the kids
> > > will hold their user group meetings.
> >
> > We wouldn't have meetings, to make this easy for Kids, but aside from
> > KIDLUG, we may host a general LUG convention, but that really is in the
> > works. Sorry about the confusion, perhaps when KIDLUG is finished it will
> > be easier to interpret. The reason why we don't have such a complicated
> > system, is so that we can bring young Lego Maniacs into the newsgroups,
> > and they participate.
>
> All right, I'm still confused. Just read the "information package" of
> files that you put up today at...
>
> http://www.kidlug.org/files/html/
>
> ...and it answers a lot of questions (things like age groups, general
> purpose, etc.), but I'm still having trouble understanding what it's about.
>
> If you don't have user group meetings, then how is it a user group?
>
> If you already have KIDLUG web-message-boards (via coolboard.com), why would
> you want a KIDLUG newsgroup on LUGNET?
>
> It sounds more to me like your goal is to start an online community with the
> target market being kid-aged fans of LEGO rather than a LEGO user group for
> kids.
>
> --Todd
Well, as you know, the internet, is an evergrowing tool for communication, and
for the way we plan to run things, it can cover a much larger purpose over the
web. We also plan om haveing information for kids, and not just the
disscussion groups. As I may have finished earlier, I think the a Kidlug
message board will tie it in opeing up a much larger experience for users.
Many more kids would become active in Lugnet through sites like us. There is
nothing wrong with having adults in Lug communities, but still, I thought that
Legos were originally a kids toy. I think it's great that adults have taken
part in this, but kids really add to the purpose. Also, I feel that we should
make Kidlug as much of a normal LUG as possible, and many people I think would
like to see lugnet.org.us.kidlug. I really hope that that clears more up, it
is just that we don't have as narrow a vision as we maybe should.
Aaron
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Can we have a Newsgroup for KIDLUG?
|
| (...) OK, I just set this up. (...) All right -- well, good luck! -- sounds like a great thing if you can make it happen. Hopefully the new group will help some! --Todd (27 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.org)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Can we have a Newsgroup for KIDLUG?
|
| (...) All right, I'm still confused. Just read the "information package" of files that you put up today at... (URL) it answers a lot of questions (things like age groups, general purpose, etc.), but I'm still having trouble understanding what it's (...) (27 years ago, 23-Feb-00, to lugnet.org)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
