 | | Re: LUGNET's code [was: Random thought of the day]
|
|
--SNIP-- (...) Cool, sounds like PHP done right. Tim (19 years ago, 19-Jul-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | take the MIT weblog survey
|
|
There is a general social survey of weblog authors being conducted at the MIT Media Laboratory. For more information, visit: (URL) survey takes about 15 minutes to complete, and we are asking anyone with a weblog to participate. The larger the (...) (19 years ago, 9-Jul-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Is there a standard syntax?
|
|
(...) Doh! It looks as though, once again, you're correct. As it turns out, the old "file.bat" accessed a location on the network, rather than the internet. Darn it. Thanks for ending my wild goose chase, though. Dave! (19 years ago, 30-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Is there a standard syntax?
|
|
(...) That works if the site is on your windows network, so you can access it as \\hostname\path\to\file... But if it's not available, I don't think it's doable... Say, if you try to copy (URL) to your local drive, I don't think it'll work. But I'd (...) (19 years ago, 30-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Is there a standard syntax?
|
|
(...) I wish I could remember or find it, but it was something dirt-simple like this: copy //www.doofus.com/dol...d/fool.txt c:\network\fool.txt but I can't recall the formatting, and that's the whole problem. Dave! (19 years ago, 30-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Is there a standard syntax?
|
|
(...) Does that mean that XP provides an internal way to download files? How does that work? Can you show us that one line? :) (19 years ago, 30-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Is there a standard syntax?
|
|
(...) After I left work last night I realized that my formulation of the question was really feeble, so here's some more info, if it helps. I guess it's not *really* DOS but is intead a DOS shell running on Windows XP. In my former department I used (...) (19 years ago, 30-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Is there a standard syntax?
|
|
(...) Dave, I'm pretty sure you can't do it without an external program. If you have FTP access to the file, you can use the command-line ftp program included with most msdos versions, otherwise you will need a non-dos program, I would recommend GNU (...) (19 years ago, 29-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Is there a standard syntax?
|
|
Hi All: I know next to zilch about programming, even in DOS, so this question is asked in ignorance and good faith. If I'm writing a .bat program to copy a file from a known, static location on the web, is there a standard format by which the (...) (19 years ago, 29-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Falling thru earth revisited
|
|
(...) Yeah, like do you have to fly at an angle to avoid hitting the sides due to the earth's rotation? (...) Isn't this the whole idea behind the gravity slingshot they use to accelerate spacecraft? It worked in "2010" and I think NASA uses it all (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Preposterously simple stat question
|
|
(...) Then I can say with confidence that we've been picking the same numbers all this time. Dave! (19 years ago, 22-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Preposterously simple stat question
|
|
It doesn't matter what numbers you choose...as long as you don't choose the same numbers I do (you would be destined to lose if you did). -->Bruce<-- (19 years ago, 22-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Preposterously simple stat question
|
|
(...) Often, I'm told, birthdays and anniversaries are the source of a lot of lotto-style picks. If so, numbers 1-12 are very common, and 13-31 are more common. 32-40, not being easy date numbers, are thus more rare. (19 years ago, 22-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Preposterously simple stat question
|
|
(...) Intuitively I sensed that numbers-is-numbers, but I couldn't logic it out enough to settle my brain on the matter. Thanks for the clarification! Dave! (19 years ago, 21-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Preposterously simple stat question
|
|
(...) Statistically, assuming it's a fair draw, there should be no difference, as this is a draw with replacement (each time you start drawing 6 numbers, all 40 are there) at the start of the draw, between any 6 numbers. Non statistically, that is, (...) (19 years ago, 21-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Preposterously simple stat question
|
|
Assume a weekly lottery that draws six numbers from the series 1 through 40, with no duplicates. Statistically speaking, am I better off repeatedly playing the same six numbers selecting six numbers at random each week? It seems to me that if (in a (...) (19 years ago, 21-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Thoughts?
|
|
(...) Update - I don't know why this piqued my interest, but it did. Anyway, Googling for PIC16F876 and CD4066BCM brought up a couple of interesting pages. Some of the images came from (URL) this page> on DansData web site. There's also a (URL) (...) (19 years ago, 16-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Working with Excel and XML?
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lar(at@at)miltontra...t.dot)com> wrote in message news:IHx8rs.1Er8@lugnet.com... (...) contents of (...) headers) (...) XML (...) Excel XML (...) into (...) put (...) if you (...) that (...) Thanks for the suggestions. I had (...) (19 years ago, 14-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Working with Excel and XML?
|
|
(...) I use Excel to generate HTML tags all the time. But I'm not using the Excel XML process myself, I am just using formulas to get the contents of tables into tagged HTML One thing that bites me somewhat regularly is the fact that Excel wants to (...) (19 years ago, 11-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Working with Excel and XML?
|
|
(...) Probably simpler to have excel save it as a CSV and use perl or somesuch to transform the CSV into XML. That's assuming the webapp couldn't be made to import the CSV directly... (19 years ago, 11-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
