Subject:
|
Re: Googolplex (was: Is lego *truly* unlimited?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Fri, 10 Dec 2004 18:53:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2128 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Ross Crawford wrote:
> I found the following amusing description of how to visualise a googolplex:
> [snip]
> From http://www.fpx.de/fp/Fun/Googolplex/GetAGoogol.html
Ha! Interesting how similar that actually is to the 'how many Lego MOCs can you
build' question, given that it only obtains a googolplex by measuring the number
of "distinct" states by a wholly ridiculous number of particles. And try as I
might, I can't get the number of Lego configurations to get much beyond
1x10^10^20-something. The factors just aren't big enough. If only you were
allowed to multiply the exponents instead of just add them. Ahh well.
DaveE
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Googolplex (was: Is lego *truly* unlimited?)
|
| (...) I found the following amusing description of how to visualise a googolplex: "...if one put this black hole into a hypothetical rigid nonpermeable box, a few million light years in size, and looked at the contents once a year, it would look (...) (20 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
18 Messages in This Thread: ![Is lego *truly* unlimited? (some thoughts) -Samarth Moray (8-Dec-04 to lugnet.general, lugnet.build)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Is lego *truly* unlimited? (some thoughts) -James Mastros (8-Dec-04 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Is lego *truly* unlimited? (some thoughts) -Olof Dahlberg (8-Dec-04 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Is lego *truly* unlimited? (some thoughts) -Samarth Moray (8-Dec-04 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Is lego *truly* unlimited? (some thoughts) -Cary Clark (8-Dec-04 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Is lego *truly* unlimited? (some thoughts) -Juergen Stuber (8-Dec-04 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Is lego *truly* unlimited? (some thoughts) -David Koudys (8-Dec-04 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Is lego *truly* unlimited? (some thoughts) -Ted Michon (8-Dec-04 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Is lego *truly* unlimited? (some thoughts) -Anders Isaksson (8-Dec-04 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Is lego *truly* unlimited? (some thoughts) -David Eaton (8-Dec-04 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Is lego *truly* unlimited? (some thoughts) -Ray Sanders (8-Dec-04 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Is lego *truly* unlimited? (some thoughts) -Samarth Moray (9-Dec-04 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Is lego *truly* unlimited? (some thoughts) -David Eaton (9-Dec-04 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Googolplex (was: Is lego *truly* unlimited?) -Ross Crawford (9-Dec-04 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Is lego *truly* unlimited? (some thoughts) -Rob Hendrix (8-Dec-04 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Is lego *truly* unlimited? (some thoughts) -David Koudys (8-Dec-04 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Is lego *truly* unlimited? (some thoughts) -Samarth Moray (9-Dec-04 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|